Donald is about to go through some things...

[One Brow]

You do know that means, right? It means that what I said earlier about Trump not being part of the 36th or 37th Congress, not being the head of a department (the executive branch is a branch not a department), and not being in the military means the 14th Amendment doesn't apply due to the Amnesty Act of May 22, 1872. Everyone arguing with me on that one can suck it.

Here is the judge's ruling:

https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/02nd_Judicial_District/Denver_District_Court/11_17_2023%20Final%20Order.pdf

It does not, AFAICT, refer in any way to the Amnesty Act of 1872. I will "suck it" if you can find such a reference, but for now, you remain an ignorant boob, blinded by partisanship into delusions of competency. Instead, it finds that the 14th Amendment is not intended to be applied to the Presidency at all, based on the language of the 14th Amendment. IOWs, confirmed insurrectionists may run for President, even if they would be ineligible to run for Senator or serve in the Cabinet (paragraphs 312-315).

We now have 100% of all legal precedent anywhere in the United States validating the standard of the 14th Amendment not applying to the US President.

Wrong, as usual. We now have 100% of all legal precedent anywhere in the United States validating the standard of the 14th Amendment not applying to people campaigning to be the US President.

 

[Red]

View: https://twitter.com/harrylitman/status/1725701240443768917



View: https://twitter.com/harrylitman/status/1725701242587119908


View: https://twitter.com/tribelaw/status/1725845183323873411


View: https://twitter.com/tribelaw/status/1725852322771636493

 

[str8line]

You do know that means, right? It means that what I said earlier about Trump not being part of the 36th or 37th Congress, not being the head of a department (the executive branch is a branch not a department), and not being in the military means the 14th Amendment doesn't apply due to the Amnesty Act of May 22, 1872. Everyone arguing with me on that one can suck it. We now have 100% of all legal precedent anywhere in the United States validating the standard of the 14th Amendment not applying to the US President. It appears you democracy subverters won't be able to subvert democracy after all.

It means it will go to the Supreme Court and they will decide whether to throw the U.S. in the trash can or not.

Sent from my SM-G986U using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Democrat Congressman calls for Trump to be assassinated to save democracy because apparently democracy means killing political opponents so voters only have one choice. He did later walk the comment back to blame it on a poor choice of words and what he really meant was that Trump needed to be killed, errr no, um, I mean, murdered. Wait. What Trump needs is to get fewer votes. Yeah, that's what he meant by his mouth words talking.

House Democrat apologizes after saying Trump ‘has to be eliminated’

Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.) apologized Monday for his “poor choice of words” when he said former President Trump must be “eliminated” to protect democracy. “Yesterday on TV, I mistakenly used the …

thehill.com

 

[One Brow]

Democrat Congressman calls for Trump to be assassinated to save democracy because apparently democracy means killing political opponents so voters only have one choice. He did later walk the comment back to blame it on a poor choice of words and what he really meant was that Trump needed to be killed, errr no, um, I mean, murdered. Wait. What Trump needs is to get fewer votes. Yeah, that's what he meant by his mouth words talking.

House Democrat apologizes after saying Trump ‘has to be eliminated’

Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.) apologized Monday for his “poor choice of words” when he said former President Trump must be “eliminated” to protect democracy. “Yesterday on TV, I mistakenly used the …

thehill.com

Has Trump ever walked back the use of "vermin"? Predictably, that you take Goldman's walk-back as evidence he meant it, and Trump's refusal to walk-back as evidence he did not mean it.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Has Trump ever walked back the use of "vermin"? Predictably, that you take Goldman's walk-back as evidence he meant it, and Trump's refusal to walk-back as evidence he did not mean it.

There is a big difference between calling something harmful to society (vermin) and saying someone needs to be killed (eliminated). I do happen to believe that governmental corruption is harmful to society.

 

[One Brow]

There is a big difference between calling something harmful to society (vermin) and saying someone needs to be killed (eliminated). I do happen to believe that governmental corruption is harmful to society.

Thank you for the confirmation.

 

[fishonjazz]

There is a big difference between calling something harmful to society (vermin) and saying someone needs to be killed (eliminated). I do happen to believe that governmental corruption is harmful to society.

Eh trump said that a general (milley) should be killed for........... Disagreeing with trump or something.
Also, trump said he could kill someone on 5th avenue and not lose any supporters.
Also, trump said when the looting starts the shooting starts.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Eh trump said that a general (milley) should be killed for........... Disagreeing with trump or something.
Also, trump said he could kill someone on 5th avenue and not lose any supporters.
Also, trump said when the looting starts the shooting starts.

Regarding Milley, you've got to show me an actual quote. As far as his 5th avenue claim, he didn't say that anyone should be shot on 5th avenue let alone that someone should be killed. Lastly, when law breaks down, yes shooting starts. That isn't to say it is a good thing but it also isn't necessarily wrong. All of your whataboutisms are weak sauce.

 

[Deleted member 365]

Trump is always the victim. And then once you show him the Milley quote, he’ll downplay it or play the whatabout game. You can go through all the indictments, play the phone call to Georgia’s Sec of State, and play footage of the Jan 6 insurrection (and read him the interviews of Trump cabinet members the month preceding the insurrection) and it won’t matter. It’s a never ending cycle for those in cult 45. It gives them entertainment and a sense of worth defending the indefensible.

 

[fishonjazz]

Regarding Milley, you've got to show me an actual quote. As far as his 5th avenue claim, he didn't say that anyone should be shot on 5th avenue let alone that someone should be killed. Lastly, when law breaks down, yes shooting starts. That isn't to say it is a good thing but it also isn't necessarily wrong. All of your whataboutisms are weak sauce.

Your whataboutisms are the weak sauce.
cnn: https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/28/politics/milley-donald-trump-execution-comment/index.html
Fox: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-comment-punishing-gen-milley-death-causes-major-outcry-gop

Not that you actually care if trump does something wrong.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

cnn: https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/28/politics/milley-donald-trump-execution-comment/index.html
Fox: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-comment-punishing-gen-milley-death-causes-major-outcry-gop

Yup, those where dumb things to says. I really, really don't like Milley but to brand him treasonous or that his acts would have warranted execution in times long ago is really awful.