Donald is about to go through some things...

[Sardines]

Despite what some would have you believe, this is no small matter.

High court ruling on presidential immunity threatens the rule of law, scholars warn - Berkeley News

Berkeley experts say the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling could allow presidents to commit crime under the guise of official business. One called the decision "dangerous."

news.berkeley.edu

“In effect, the scholars said, the court put the president largely above the law in a way that was never written into the U.S. Constitution or established in more than 200 years of legal precedent. That could precipitate a crisis in the near term, they said, if former President Donald Trump wins re-election in November and uses the new protections with impunity to pursue his political opponents…..

“Berkeley political scientist Terri Bimes, a scholar in the history and operation of the U.S. presidency, called the court’s ruling “dangerous.” “The decision seems to permit the president to use the power of the office to commit acts that are illegal, that are criminal,” Bimes said. “The fact that these actions are being taken in the name of the presidency, that they’re official acts, makes them immune from prosecution. That is really problematic.”….

“Broadly considered, they said, the Supreme Court’s ruling could fundamentally change the presidency, dramatically increasing its power and making the nation more vulnerable to authoritarian leaders who might pursue power by any means necessary”.

Conservative Legal Icon Condemns Trump Immunity Ruling In No Uncertain Terms

J. Michael Luttig said the decision represented the "unsouling" of America.

www.huffpost.com

According to some here Jan. 6th was no big deal.

I continue to see things differently.

 

[Deleted member 365]

What treason did Liz Cheney do?

She spoke out against Orange god king. Duh Fuhrer doesn’t tolerate disloyalty.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Sounds like the supreme Court had no need to make any rulings then.

The Supreme Court took the case because the Biden administration was using the DOJ in a way that had never been used, so they wanted to provide a framework for how the government would proceed with the prosecution of Trump. That is it. The ONLY reason this ruling is a big deal is because the left-of-center media apparatus was desperate to find anything to talk about that wasn't Biden's cognitive decline. They latched on to this nothing story and spun it to absurdity. We don't now have a king. The President can't assassinate political rivals. Trump is still being prosecuted, but now the prosecution has to go through the extra step of arguing over events being official acts or non-official acts. Oh noes.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Despite what some would have you believe, this is no small matter.

Why believe your own lying eyes as you watch the election go on as before, and the prosecution of Trump go on as before when there are paid shills who peddle a fantasy?

 

[Red]

Really.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Really.

View attachment 16680

Yes, really.

 

[SteakNEggs]

Despite what some would have you believe, this is no small matter.

High court ruling on presidential immunity threatens the rule of law, scholars warn - Berkeley News

Berkeley experts say the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling could allow presidents to commit crime under the guise of official business. One called the decision "dangerous."

news.berkeley.edu

“In effect, the scholars said, the court put the president largely above the law in a way that was never written into the U.S. Constitution or established in more than 200 years of legal precedent. That could precipitate a crisis in the near term, they said, if former President Donald Trump wins re-election in November and uses the new protections with impunity to pursue his political opponents…..

“Berkeley political scientist Terri Bimes, a scholar in the history and operation of the U.S. presidency, called the court’s ruling “dangerous.” “The decision seems to permit the president to use the power of the office to commit acts that are illegal, that are criminal,” Bimes said. “The fact that these actions are being taken in the name of the presidency, that they’re official acts, makes them immune from prosecution. That is really problematic.”….

“Broadly considered, they said, the Supreme Court’s ruling could fundamentally change the presidency, dramatically increasing its power and making the nation more vulnerable to authoritarian leaders who might pursue power by any means necessary”.

Conservative Legal Icon Condemns Trump Immunity Ruling In No Uncertain Terms

J. Michael Luttig said the decision represented the "unsouling" of America.

www.huffpost.com

Legal precedent... You fascist are the first ones in history to pull Hitler tactics up and arrest political opponents. The Christian hater speech cult are the ones setting insane precedents. Us Republicans want to protect every president not just Trump. You guys just want to stop Trump at any cost whether it be illegally taking him of ballots or arresting him for alleged crimes that multiple AG's and even the FEC has denied there were crimes.

So you're saying Biden should be in jail for breaking the law for his illegal vaccine mandates? Shouldn't Biden be prosecuted for allowing millions of illegals in? Shouldn't Biden be arrested for illegally paying off student loans? Every one of you hypocrites better answer yes to this and push for his immediate arrest.

 

[Red]

Why believe your own lying eyes as you watch the election go on as before, and the prosecution of Trump go on as before when there are paid shills who peddle a fantasy?

You’re obviously free to do what you wish with your time, but you’re wasting it trying to persuade me of your nonsense. My go-to analysts in the SC decision on presidential immunity include Neal Katyal, Andrew Weismann, J. Michael Guttig, Lawrence Tribe, among others. I find them far more persuasive than anything you’ve offered. I find your spin to be ludicrous.

 

[Red]

Yes, really.

Lolol, glad we see eye to eye…..

 

[fishonjazz]

The Supreme Court took the case because the Biden administration was using the DOJ in a way that had never been used, so they wanted to provide a framework for how the government would proceed with the prosecution of Trump. That is it. The ONLY reason this ruling is a big deal is because the left-of-center media apparatus was desperate to find anything to talk about that wasn't Biden's cognitive decline. They latched on to this nothing story and spun it to absurdity. We don't now have a king. The President can't assassinate political rivals. Trump is still being prosecuted, but now the prosecution has to go through the extra step of arguing over events being official acts or non-official acts. Oh noes.

Trump doesn't become president and this ruling never happens. It happened because trump stacked the supreme court with loyalists and trump likes corruption and no other president in history has been as corrupt as trump.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[SteakNEggs]

Trump doesn't become president and this ruling never happens. It happened because trump stacked the supreme court with loyalists and trump likes corruption and no other president in history has been as corrupt as trump.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

There were 6 votes, Trump appointed 3. It's embarrassing that you didn't know that but not surprising at all. Like at all.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Trump doesn't become president and this ruling never happens. It happened because trump stacked the supreme court with loyalists and trump likes corruption

I have no doubt that I won't change your mind on why it happened, and I'm not going to try, but it is the total lie over what happened in the ruling that is so incredible to me.

@Red, who I consider to be a smart guy, thinks Biden now has the power to cancel elections and remain as a king but is only not doing so because of his own morals. I can point to upcoming court dates in trials where Trump is being prosecuted, but the opinion that Presidents are now immune from prosecution is everywhere.

People can read the decision for themselves. People can see the court dates for themselves. People can see election dates for themselves. It is not like this is some hidden knowledge. The only reason the narrative can persist is because people are pulling the wool over their own eyes. I can try and lift the wool only for vast swaths to quickly put the wool back in place to shield out reality. People are weird.