What's new
By:

Donald Trump

BabyPeterzz said:
Relax dude. I have no desire to work with the Feds, I feel your pain. Jesus...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
If you read back a little bit in this thread you will discover that you were the one defending the work of public agencies vs. private entities. I know you don't pay very close attention to the words you type, so go ahead and insult Stoked for bringing information to the discussion that pretty much eradicates your position while trying to suggest that it never was your position. Discussing this with you is nearly as frustrating as trying to use logic when dealing with a government bureaucrat. Oh... wait a sec, I know why that is.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
If you read back a little bit in this thread you will discover that you were the one defending the work of public agencies vs. private entities. I know you don't pay very close attention to the words you type, so go ahead and insult Stoked for bringing information to the discussion that pretty much eradicates your position while trying to suggest that it never was your position. Discussing this with you is nearly as frustrating as trying to use logic when dealing with a government bureaucrat. Oh... wait a sec, I know why that is.
Click to expand...

I'll assume Stoked has more experience than I do with working in the federal sphere and appreciate his experience. If you go read my post again, I edited and added a little more context. I in no way meant to insult him and apologize if I did. This is not an opportunity for you to swing from his nuts to make your ill informed, whiney argument since you still don't know what you're talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
can we please get to happier "logical" discussions? Like, for example, the miraculous economic power of imagination??
 
BabyPeterzz said:
I'll assume Stoked has more experience than I do with working in the federal sphere and appreciate his experience. If you go read my post again, I edited and added a little more context. I in no way meant to insult him and apologize if I did. This is not an opportunity for you to swing from his nuts to make your ill informed, whiney argument since you still don't know what you're talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
That was one of the strangest conversations I've ever had. And LOL at the way you edited your insults toward Stoked and then piled a bunch of insults on me in the same post. Nice work.
 
NAOS said:
can we please get to happier "logical" discussions? Like, for example, the miraculous economic power of imagination??
Click to expand...

cartman_trump.jpg
 
Well today could be the day that it is all over. If Donald and Hillary win in big today it's game over.
 
Stoked said:
Well today could be the day that it is all over. If Donald and Hillary win in big today it's game over.
Click to expand...

That will be the media spin. It's not totally true. Hillary has to win big today because many of the states that she holds big advantages happen to vote early. Bernie's advantages kick in late. I think Bernie needs to win 4 states today to stay viable.

Donald would almost do best by winning 60% of the states voting today and having Rubio and Cruz win two each. The longer opposition to Donald remains split the better it is for him going forward.
 
Sirkickyass said:
That will be the media spin. It's not totally true. Hillary has to win big today because many of the states that she holds big advantages happen to vote early. Bernie's advantages kick in late. I think Bernie needs to win 4 states today to stay viable.

Donald would almost do best by winning 60% of the states voting today and having Rubio and Cruz win two each. The longer opposition to Donald remains split the better it is for him going forward.
Click to expand...

It is based off an "if".

Clinton also has the super delegates on her side in an over whelming number from what I have read. See N.H.

I agree that Cruz and Rubio split the anti trump vote. But neither will drop out any time soon IMO.
 
Stoked said:
It is based off an "if".

Clinton also has the super delegates on her side in an over whelming number from what I have read. See N.H.
Click to expand...

Clinton had a huge lead at this time in superdelegates in the 2008 cycle. They jumped ship when she started losing primaries.

The superdelegate thing is a problem, but the Dems are concerned enough about the appearance of fairness that if Bernie wins a majority of pledged delegates you're going to see a lot of people switch camps.
 
Sirkickyass said:
Clinton had a huge lead at this time in superdelegates in the 2008 cycle. They jumped ship when she started losing primaries.

The superdelegate thing is a problem, but the Dems are concerned enough about the appearance of fairness that if Bernie wins a majority of pledged delegates you're going to see a lot of people switch camps.
Click to expand...

Well I think they both win big today and that mostly settles it. Will be interesting to see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top