What's new
By:

Donovan Mitchell unlikely to ask for trade per ESPN’s Brian Windhorst

Handlogten's Heros said:
If you put garbage around him then it won't make him happy or look good. Our record will be rough... I'm not sure its a great situation to get cooperation from your star that you are "building around".
Click to expand...
Might put up the monsterest stats though. I dont really care about his cooperation. I say trade him to the team that offers us the best package regardless of how don feels about it.
 
fishonjazz said:
Might put up the monsterest stats though. I dont really care about his cooperation. I say trade him to the team that offers us the best package regardless of how don feels about it.
Click to expand...
I mean me too... but if he half asses it because he has garbage players around him it won't help. I am pro-trade him before the season. In the scenario I was laying out he was still on the roster. If he's on the roster I just don't think you can sell everything off and genuinely tell suitors "we are building around Donovan". If he gets pissy then it puts pressure on us to do something. He's much more likely to get pissy on a ****** roster.
 
fishonjazz said:
Might put up the monsterest stats though. I dont really care about his cooperation. I say trade him to the team that offers us the best package regardless of how don feels about it.
Click to expand...

I think everyone feels that way. The cooperation in the post HH said wasn’t about cooperation with a trade it was cooperation with a rebuild. If we suck don’t you think he’s going to want out eventually?
 
Elizah Huge said:
You do know they’re the same age right now right? That would be some kind of leap he’d take especially when Brunson is signed for 4 years.
Click to expand...
Brunson won’t matter when Quickley is the all-star PG on America’s team, the Utah Jazzzzzz
 
KqWIN said:
OK, so I did miscalculate there. I’ll apologize for that one. I still don’t believe it’s the same situation as OKC previously amending the protections. And as I’ve said before, I still don’t think 2023/2027/2029 is a good enough deal to accept right now. I’d feel very confident in getting a better offer in the future.
Click to expand...

How much more is Donovan worth than Dejounte?
 
Elizah Huge said:
I think everyone feels that way. The cooperation in the post HH said wasn’t about cooperation with a trade it was cooperation with a rebuild. If we suck don’t you think he’s going to want out eventually?
Click to expand...
Exactly. He already wants out imo regardless of who we get around him. Get crap players around him for the rebuild (and tank) and trade him next year. I dont see why we have to get good players around him and then lose him when he leaves anyways.
 
Elizah Huge said:
I think everyone feels that way. The cooperation in the post HH said wasn’t about cooperation with a trade it was cooperation with a rebuild. If we suck don’t you think he’s going to want out eventually?
Click to expand...
wouldn't that be a good thing? let's make it happen sooner than later so we can get a top 4 pick next year in a strong, top heavy draft.
 
Elizah Huge said:
How much more is Donovan worth than Dejounte?
Click to expand...

I mean…we just did this with Gobert and you said that wasn’t fair….but regardless, Mitchell is a lot better and a lot more valuable.

To use the other side of this argument…this MIA deal is like getting 80 cents on the dollar. Those are HH’s words not mine. My question is….why are we taking 80%? Are we so scared that we’re going to get 75% that we lock ourselves into 80%? That’s not how I would do things. I would ask for 120%, and if you get to close to 100% even value that’s when we start thinking about taking the deal. You aim to win deals, not try to mitigate downside and settle for 80%.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top