D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Who attacked who first here? Be honest.
How is providing public information of donors considered an attack? Unless trump thinks that knowing such public information will hurt either himself or the donors? Couldn’t that information also incentivize trump supporters and lead to an increase in business and donations?
Furthermore, don’t you find your own arguments to be disingenuous? I mean, your side had no problem listing Clinton's top donors. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, right? We even have it on tape when your president asked Russia to find hacked (stolen) private emails. Were you clutching your pearls then too?
As far as who attacked who first, cmon, why can’t we hold Donald to a higher standard than a three year old? He’s the president. If he can’t block out the distractions for a few hours an focus, maybe he shouldn’t be president? Imagine if President Obama had reacted to every single partisan attack. The man couldn’t even eat a hot dog or wear a tan suit without being ridiculed by your side.
So I find this “outrage” to be pretty disingenuous, as most outrages from the right are. Boy, their victim card sure is racking up a ton of charges lately. Sheesh