If I was a prison guard I wouldn't give two ***** what happened to Epstein. My paycheck is the same either way.Yeah, and we also need to use our brains and make "logical" assumptions. If you were a prison guard and a guy had just been taken off suicide watch because he supposedly had tried to hang himself (there were supposedly rope burns around his neck), the logical assumption is that a) the prison guard and his bosses would make doubly sure he didn't have anything in his possession with which he could hang himself or b) the guards and prison officials are so ****ing stupid and incompetent they need to be relieved of their jobs at once. Sounds like the reality you're living in, is la-la land, where someday you're going to go to heaven and live happily everafter with our benevolent creator.
No, I think Thriller is making a pretty assumption rich argument as well.
I don't just believe things because I want to.
I don't know with any certainty at all what happened in that cell. I have no idea what happened. My imagination is not where I gather information in figuring out what did happen. So I will not be making specific claims about what I "know" happened or didn't happen.
It's called living in reality. A fact based existence where you have to have something tangible before you start making firm assertions about things.
He was evaluated daily. That's how. If you have specific insight into how suicide watch works, enlighten us. Otherwise you're doing the "it's obvious, duh!" thing that is completely unconvincing.Guy attempts suicide once already.
Taking him off suicide watch makes sense how?
Wouldn't you at least wait until he had his day in court and outed a few people out?
When an investigation is underway this is the exact approach. That is what the investigation into substantiated Russian interference was. Since then many have been indicted, prosecuted and convicted. So Sounds like you approve?Wow. That would have been a great approach to Russia Gate. Wish the left would adopt this.
Sure, and why would they allow him to have a rope with which to hang himself if he had tried to do so not long before? Not only this, he was an important prisoner with lots of damaging information to very important people. You think they are going to treat him so casually? Use your head and stop being so pig-headed. If you are right, then the people who run the prisons are dumber than you.He was evaluated daily. That's how. If you have specific insight into how suicide watch works, enlighten us. Otherwise you're doing the "it's obvious, duh!" thing that is completely unconvincing.
He used a rope to hang himself?Sure, and why would they allow him to have a rope with which to hang himself if he had tried to do so not long before? Not only this, he was an important prisoner with lots of damaging information to very important people. You think they are going to treat him so casually? Use your head and stop being so pig-headed. If you are right, then the people who run the prisons are dumber than you.
He was evaluated daily. That's how. If you have specific insight into how suicide watch works, enlighten us. Otherwise you're doing the "it's obvious, duh!" thing that is completely unconvincing.
If you know something provide the evidence. That's where I'm at.Sure, and why would they allow him to have a rope with which to hang himself if he had tried to do so not long before? Not only this, he was an important prisoner with lots of damaging information to very important people. You think they are going to treat him so casually? Use your head and stop being so pig-headed. If you are right, then the people who run the prisons are dumber than you.
It was more than a week later. give me info on other cases of suicide watch and how it's handled or stfu.Your first sentence did the "its obvious duh"
I dont need specific insight to how it works to know that taking him off suicide watch doesnt make sense.
Epstein: tries killing himself
Prison: you good Epstein?
Epstein: Ya, Im good now
Prison: ok, take him off suicide watch. He told us he is good.
Protocol followed: Check
I don't know what he used, but if it were something with which he could hang himself, you think they are going to let him have it, a guy who had previously tried to hang himself? The most important factor here is that he wasn't just an ordinary prisoner, some homeless guy. He had damaging information about Clinton, possibly Trump, an English prince. In fact, he was connected with the CIA in international currency manipulation. This guy was important and you don't treat someone like this with indifference.He used a rope to hang himself?
Link?
Or are you talking straight out of your ***?