Inasmuch as bureaucracy breeds apathy, so also can bureaucracy need an apt scape goat when **** hits the fan. My guess would those people will find themselves laid off. Or, if you’re into conspiracy, dead.
I don't think so. It is something I absolutely want more information about before I form an opinion. It is highly suspicious.
It's just that I don't go from "I'm pretty confused/suspicious about this point" to "I absolutely know all the facts about this entire situation" like you seem comfortable doing.
Getting Traded
Banned
I don't know all the facts. I'm making logical deductions based on the situation. There are three possibilities:
1. The prison personnel were stupid, ignorant, and incompetent, and as a result he was able to hang himself
2. He was murdered
3. He was rescued by deep-state personnel who created a ruse with a dead body double to prevent Epstein from going to trial leading to revelations that would damage people like Clinton, Trump, and other important persons who had sex with underage individuals.
And by not giving a **** either way I'd be ready to work with whoever to save my own ***.
Again, assumptions, especially ones formed via biased outlooks, don't equal knowledge.
There are many possibilities other than those.
You're not some supreme authority on what is logical. In fact, you're one of the most obviously clueless people on Jazzfanz. That's not saying much, as jazzfanz isn't all that big a website. So There are probably at least a million or so people more clueless than you. But you are in the top 5% of clueless people in the U.S.. I know you don't realize this (because of how ****ing clueless you are) but take my word for it, it's obvious, duh!
Getting Traded
Banned
That may be your opinion. But I believe you're dumb as a piece of granite. So, tell me, what are the other possibilities? The most logical one is number two. Number one and three are possible, as well, but unlikely. And there is no supreme authority on logic. It's simply connecting the dots. If he committed suicide, then it was incompetence and stupidity on the part of the prison that allowed it. If he was murdered, then it was because he had damaging information incriminating very important people. If he was rescued, well, there are scenarios in history in which such things have happened, and there in fact is a lot of evidence that Hitler actually was safely taken to Argentina where he lived out his life. You have some other possible suggestions?
It's my bedtime sweetheart. Let's cuddle some other time. I'm too tired for this right now.
Getting Traded
Banned
You simply have no answers except to call me names. Ad hominem attacks occur when people have no sufficient answers to rebut the other person.
I don’t believe I’ve made any assumptions.
Like you have any real information to prove this comment.
Getting Traded
Banned
Gameface apparently doesn't understand what logic is, or how to be logical. So, because I use logic, I'm clueless. I'd like to know what are the many possibilities. There are only two: one, he is dead (either by suicide or murder), and the other, he is still alive (he was rescued by deep-state operatives).
So far as the possibility that it's the second one, consider the way we have been deceived by the deep state in other situations:
1. The JFK assassination -- Hundreds of books have been written about this and so much disinformation has been introduced and so much information withheld (why are they still withholding information; what are they hiding after 56 years?) that it's difficult to determine exactly what happened. But logic tells you that it wasn't just Oswald and maybe not him at all.
2. 9-11 -- When you understand that skyscrapers implode only through a demolition and the use of thermite with explosives and not by being hit by a plane (experts in skyscraper construction will tell you this), then logic tells you it was an inside job
3. Second Iraq War -- When no evidence of WMDs has ever been found, then the logical assumption is that the U.S. created it as an excuse to start a war with Iraq.
Yet, people refuse to use logic and instead believe illogical statements made by our government which is trying to persuade us to give it our support. As Chomsky said, and I'm sure most people don't consider him clueless, in democracies, governments need the consent of the governed, so they "manufacture consent" to do what they want. I didn't make that up, Chomsky did.
So far as the possibility that it's the second one, consider the way we have been deceived by the deep state in other situations:
1. The JFK assassination -- Hundreds of books have been written about this and so much disinformation has been introduced and so much information withheld (why are they still withholding information; what are they hiding after 56 years?) that it's difficult to determine exactly what happened. But logic tells you that it wasn't just Oswald and maybe not him at all.
2. 9-11 -- When you understand that skyscrapers implode only through a demolition and the use of thermite with explosives and not by being hit by a plane (experts in skyscraper construction will tell you this), then logic tells you it was an inside job
3. Second Iraq War -- When no evidence of WMDs has ever been found, then the logical assumption is that the U.S. created it as an excuse to start a war with Iraq.
Yet, people refuse to use logic and instead believe illogical statements made by our government which is trying to persuade us to give it our support. As Chomsky said, and I'm sure most people don't consider him clueless, in democracies, governments need the consent of the governed, so they "manufacture consent" to do what they want. I didn't make that up, Chomsky did.
Last edited:
Maybe it has and maybe it didn't. Trump is notorious for denying a relationship with some one who gets in trouble or betrays him. Doesn't change the fact he hung out with him. Personally, this Epstein story doesn't surprise me at all. I think any one involved should be held accountable.