ESPN is ranking the top 74 NBA players of all time Here are their rankins 40-11:
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/29105681/ranking-top-74-nba-players-all-nos-40-11
They have Stockton at 28 and Malone at 17. Do you agree or disagree? Thoughts?
Still think he’s too low. Needs to be higher.Stockton being ahead of Isaiah, Iverson, and Nash is great to see. The challenge of comparing players in the past to current players is always funky but if you take that out of the equation, I agree with a most of the rankings.
I went with Yao, but obviously Penny is a better example. Could throw Grant Hill in there, too. And a lot of guys, to be honest, but they're hard to name because we've completely forgotten about them, but in their day they seemed like locks.
Where’d they have Manu? 58? Way too low. He’s top-30, imo.
They’ll have Kobe in the top 10, and I think there’s only a whisker’s difference between manu and Kobe.
Where’d they have Manu? 58? Way too low. He’s top-30, imo.
They’ll have Kobe in the top 10, and I think there’s only a whisker’s difference between manu and Kobe.
He was a major piece in 4 championship teams. Dude could score from anywhere, was seriously clutch on both ends, and was a passing savant. One of the most creative players ever.Top-30? Over who? Lmao.
How should I disabuse you from the media narrative that you’ve bought into?One of the more amazing statements in the history of Jazzfanz.
Trying to prove that being wrong can be cute?