I never wanted Conley on this team. Gave up too much in trade and his salary is too high. He also exacerbates our backcourt size issue.I'm starting to have doubts about Conley in games like these. There is a lack of scoring, a lack of playmaking, and a lack of impacting the game. He was -25 tonight.
again, expectation. we gotta accept Conley for who he is. some fans here act like he's CP3 but he's just nowhere near that level of impact.I never wanted Conley on this team. Gave up too much in trade and his salary is too high. He also exacerbates our backcourt size issue.
I like Conley, but it was a mistake to bring him here. That said, he's in a bit of a slump over the last week or so, but he has had a lot of decent games this year.
Even House would've done better in that situation. At least he would've taken that open corner three instead of passing it up for an ugly turnover......I think if the Jazz had a dynamic wing with some size who could replace Royce in this situation, it would make a world of difference. When Donovan draws a trap and unloads the ball, someone has to be able to make a play and not just pass around the perimeter. Mitchell gave his team a 4-on-3 advantage, and the Jazz couldn't do anything with it. A Harrison Barnes, who could attack from the top of the circle, would be enough. It doesn't have to be an All Star.
I think if the Jazz had a dynamic wing with some size who could replace Royce in this situation, it would make a world of difference. When Donovan draws a trap and unloads the ball, someone has to be able to make a play and not just pass around the perimeter. Mitchell gave his team a 4-on-3 advantage, and the Jazz couldn't do anything with it. A Harrison Barnes, who could attack from the top of the circle, would be enough. It doesn't have to be an All Star.
Rudy Gay, in theory, would do it, but it looks like he's now too old. Maybe Paschall is the guy.
I don't know what it is that we're lacking, but I don't think it's best termed "toughness" or "mental toughness" or some such thing. Maybe just "clutchness" is best.
There's no way players like O'Neale, Gobert, and Ingles would have made it in the league it they didn't have toughness or mental fortitude out the wazoo. But they don't seem to be able to raise their level in clutch situations. DM can, and Bogey can at times, but otherwise it's not clear that we have anyone else on the team that really can do this.
I don't know if it's that they've already more or less maximized their talent such that there's simply not another level to go to, or if it's just that clutchness is just something that some players have and that others don't, or maybe it can be developed over time (ie Giannis wasn't clutch, until he was)? As @fallenchicken implies, probably the only hope I have in switching to Ainge is that he might be better at finding clutch players. Too bad that it will probably require a tear-down to get there.
At any rate, we have one more playoff season to hope the team somehow finds it, though I'm certainly not expecting that they will. I'll be rooting for them, though; and I don't think this talk about "calling out" coaches or players is the path to any kind of solution until then.
...
There's no way players like O'Neale, Gobert... would have made it in the league it they didn't have toughness or mental fortitude out the wazoo. But they don't seem to be able to raise...
I love how Andy's not afraid to tell it like it is.