Following potential 2013 draftees

[Deleted member 848]

Lol.. that's an awful lot to type as a result of misunderstanding the question.

Just went off the post I quoted, and I figured that maybe you were talking about team needs or something. Whatever h8rz.

 

[orangello]

Why would Blazers take MCW?
They have Lillard.

Because Lillard call play off the ball as much as he can play with the ball. That would just give them another distributor on the floor. I believe that you will see most NBA teams have at least two guys that can play with the ball in their hands, and do it at the same time. I think that will be true of every starting line up over the next few years. Think Curry/Jack or Wade/LBJ/Chalmers and the like.

 

[orangello]

They played Lillard off the ball at times last year with Maynor at the point, and they were quite successful.

I'm glad you saw the obvious answer there. Plus the fact that MCW is basically a PG in a SG's body makes a difference. You don't have to have two midgets on the floor together that could be a defensive liability for a team.

 

[slc]

Is another PG the Blazers top priority though?
They seem like they have lots of holes to fill.

 

[Fishsticks]

Link?

I heard it in the vip room at rhino. Beats best buys parking lot any day.

 

[Revolution 9]

Can we get this thread to 2000 pages by draft day?

 

[orangello]

I heard it in the vip room at rhino. Beats best buys parking lot any day.

Yes it does!

 

[orangello]

Is another PG the Blazers top priority though?
They seem like they have lots of holes to fill.

And MCW would fill a hole for them.

 

[slc]

OK Sounds good to me

 

[ONE LOVE]

I'm glad you saw the obvious answer there. Plus the fact that MCW is basically a PG in a SG's body makes a difference. You don't have to have two midgets on the floor together that could be a defensive liability for a team.

Yes I agree. He's great.

 

[ONE LOVE]

Can we get this thread to 2000 pages by draft day?

If we get paid doing it, it might reach it.

#knawhatimean?

 

[slc]

So if Cavs trade #1 for D Cousins like rumors say who would Kings target at #1?

 

[A-Train (old)]

So if Cavs trade #1 for D Cousins like rumors say who would Kings target at #1?

Nerlens Noel.

 

[slc]

Would anyone trade #21 for Fredette?
Just curious.

 

[ONE LOVE]

Would anyone trade #21 for Fredette?
Just curious.

noway-hosay

 

[orangello]

Would anyone trade #21 for Fredette?
Just curious.

No, not even close.

 

[orangello]

noway-hosay

This.

 

[ONE LOVE]

So if Cavs trade #1 for D Cousins like rumors say who would Kings target at #1?

Yeah they'll need another Center, they can't go pass Noel.

 

[Chargers Jazz Angels]

Why just cause they are white? I wouldn't compare wolters to hayward at all...

LOL it was a joke from before. Some one said that wolters was the pg version of hayward. then some one said that Zeller was the PF version of Hayward.

I lthink it comes down to their clean cut look.

 

[Game6Conley]

If Jazz picked Adams does anyone think Favors could play SF and have Favors Adams and Kanter on floor at same time?

i do, Favors is shorter than Kevin Durant.

his footspeed is very impressive, Millsap on the roster last year usurped any of the minutes we could afford to put a Big@3...

there are certain matchups it would work well in our favors