What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

b_line said:
D Will kinda developed in spite of Jerry. But yeah, Jerry gets more crap about developing players than he should. I mean, aside from D Will and AK, who did we ever get that was a good talent?
Click to expand...

Yeah good point!

And how about Matthews? Jerry put him in because he was playing tough defense. Yes he also made shots for us, but as long as he was fighting, Jerry would play him.

Can't say the same for Ty's "OHhhh, we have to please the vets and the soon-to-be FA's to maintain a happy locker room" approach.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Yeah good point!

And how about Matthews? Jerry put him in because he was playing tough defense. Yes he also made shots for us, but as long as he was fighting, Jerry would play him.

Can't say the same for Ty's "OHhhh, we have to please the vets and the soon-to-be FA's to maintain a happy locker room" approach.
Click to expand...

Jerry was arguably great at developing second round and undrafted talent. Which leads me to believe it was the Jazz's drafting strategy in the mid first round that sucked. As for Ty Corbin, I really do think he thinks that lottery picks are entitled, and he wants to stick it to them, or teach them a lesson. The locker room crap also bugs the hell out of me. Why do we care about a locker room this year? We needed to be coaching for the future, and keep our young kids happy.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
I said that myself as well "in my mind" a couple days ago, but didn't have time to post
Click to expand...
Link or it didn't happen.
b_line said:
D Will kinda developed in spite of Jerry. But yeah, Jerry gets more crap about developing players than he should. I mean, aside from D Will and AK, who did we ever get that was a good talent?
Click to expand...

********!! Deron was playing horrible basketball and just going through the motions. Sloan sat his *** to wake his fat *** up, then inserted him back in the starting lineup and Deron finally started playing like the third pick in the draft.
 
If Matthew Dellavedova goes undrafted, the FO HAS to sign him. He's really too good not to sign. I've said it before, he could be a REALLY good backup PG and even a starter. He has terrific hustle, he gives 110% and is fearless on defense, he has terrific court vision, very high basketball IQ, he's a great teammate, he's a good shooter, creates shots. I could go on and on.
 
Tony said:
If Matthew Dellavedova goes undrafted, the FO HAS to sign him. He's really too good not to sign. I've said it before, he could be a REALLY good backup PG and even a starter. He has terrific hustle, he gives 110% and is fearless on defense, he has terrific court vision, very high basketball IQ, he's a great teammate, he's a good shooter, creates shots. I could go on and on.
Click to expand...

What makes him go undrafted then?
 
Tony said:
Idk, that's why I said "If." I really don't think there's any reason he wouldn't go at least late in the second round. I think he'll go somewhere in the middle.
Click to expand...

He is not bad but the way you put him I thought he could be drafted at lottery.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top