orangello
Well-Known Member
PS, I still respect you. A few posts don't change that.So having an opinion on this board now gets this kind of insult/abuse?
I used to respect you.
PS, I still respect you. A few posts don't change that.So having an opinion on this board now gets this kind of insult/abuse?
I used to respect you.
I'm not abusing you at all. In fact, I'm trying to help you. 6'6" is a good to great height for a SG. The JJ comparison is bad because he is undersized for a SG and now is a defensive liability for the Clippers.
I thought all these things were obvious.
I'm not abusing you at all. In fact, I'm trying to help you. 6'6" is a good to great height for a SG. The JJ comparison is bad because he is undersized for a SG and now is a defensive liability for the Clippers.
I thought all these things were obvious.
The comparison is more than just 6'6 height (which is not official yet neither). Booker is more or less a spot up shooter now and that is who JJ Redick is.
If Booker can show me more of a dribble drive/slashing/off the dribble game than I'd lean towards Klay, but as of now he hasn't yet.
Devin Booker is pretty white.
Klay Thompson is really white.
JJ Redick is white.
Booker is outpacing Klay Thompson when comparing their Freshman year's, by far.
The size between Redick and Thompson is significant and could explain the difference in their careers. The difference between Thompson and Booker isn't as insignificant.Yeah but you can't teach size which Klay has over Booker.
The comparison is more than just 6'6 height (which is not official yet neither). Booker is more or less a spot up shooter now and that is who JJ Redick is.
If Booker can show me more of a dribble drive/slashing/off the dribble game than I'd lean towards Klay, but as of now he hasn't yet.