What's new
By:

Following potential 2015 draftees

Catchall said:
No, because I know Portis has post moves, can get above the rim and can score inside. The vid I posted of Looney is just one example.
Click to expand...

Also played in a conference that was pretty devoid of big man (not even talent, just teams with big players) outside of Kentucky or LSU.
 
Cy said:
If he can guard the 3 he can play the 3. I'm not expecting him to be a playmaking 3, just one who can defend his position, run teh floor, and hit open shots.
Click to expand...

Why move him from a position where he'd create matchup problems if he can shoot/dribble. He's got enough size to play the four. He might be able to play spot minutes as a SF but I wouldn't draft him projecting him to become a 3 and D guy.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Why move him from a position where he'd create matchup problems if he can shoot/dribble. He's got enough size to play the four. He might be able to play spot minutes as a SF but I wouldn't draft him projecting him to become a 3 and D guy.
Click to expand...

Because this is Jazzfanz: where every player needs to play some time at Small Forward. . .
 
Cy said:
Also played in a conference that was pretty devoid of big man (not even talent, just teams with big players) outside of Kentucky or LSU.
Click to expand...

He put up 15 and 8 against UK this year. There aren't many players who put up bigger numbers on UK. Kaminsky and ??

Edit: Zach Auguste from Notre Dame put up 20/9.
 
Here's the thing with SF: Gordon Hayward appears to be more productive there than as an SG. His mobility and IQ advantage at SF appears to be a bigger factor than his size advantage at SG. The numbers seem to suggest that if you compare last year to this year. So the idea of bringing in a supposed SF like Looney or Johnson may not pay off. Whereas, bringing in an SG that's long and can shoot might be a better move.

That's one of the reasons I like Oubre as a 2-way SG for the Jazz. His quickness and length between Exum and Hayward fits our defensive strategy to a tee, and he brings enough offense to fit in with the other starters.

The problem is that because Bryce Cotton had to show out in a meaningless game against Dallas, we might not be able to get Oubre.
 
Catchall said:
Here's the thing with SF: Gordon Hayward appears to be more productive there than as an SG. His mobility and IQ advantage at SF appears to be a bigger factor than his size advantage at SG. The numbers seem to suggest that if you compare last year to this year. So the idea of bringing in a supposed SF like Looney or Johnson may not pay off. Whereas, bringing in an SG that's long and can shoot might be a better move.

That's one of the reasons I like Oubre as a 2-way SG for the Jazz. His quickness and length between Exum and Hayward fits our defensive strategy to a tee, and he brings enough offense to fit in with the other starters.

The problem is that because Bryce Cotton had to show out in a meaningless game against Dallas, we might not be able to get Oubre.
Click to expand...

So are you thinking about drafting for need rather than BPA? If we're drafting for need I'd rather go the back up big route.
 
You draft by tier first and then by need within that tier. I think Oubre is on the same tier as Johnson and Kaminsky. I think Dunn might be there too. So even though these guys aren't at positions of abject need, I think we would still consider them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top