No way we're calling Will Riley "really big".
He needs a sandwich to be sure, but he's within a half inch and 8 lbs of Risacher last year, who was considered very big for a wing.
No way we're calling Will Riley "really big".
He needs a sandwich to be sure, but he's within a half inch and 8 lbs of Risacher last year, who was considered very big for a wing.
This is all true if you neglect wingspan, which is what we should all know is most important when we talk about length. Will Riley is 39th percentile SF size/physical wise. Risacher only 53rd percentile. Neither of these guys are very big. Those who consider Risacher very big are simply incorrect.
He's not an initiator, he's a connector. I dont think you know what these words mean.If you believe in Knueppel, you probably believe in him being your initiator in a more egalitarian system, rather than just a shooting wing. I'm not saying this is my favorite outcome, but I think that's the rationale for taking him ahead of Fears and Ace in the present context.
like every word that has "n" following "K" in the English languageWhat if it turns out the 'K' in Knueppel is silent...
Risacher has less than an inch of wingspan on Riley.
Yes, Riley is subpar when it comes to length, but head height is important for wing playmaking.And? Neither is a very big wing. Risacher is about average, Riley is below average.
He's not an initiator, he's a connector. I dont think you know what these words mean.
Yes, Riley is subpar when it comes to length, but head height is important for wing playmaking.
Kon isn't an initiator though. Idk why you insist on hyping up prospects by giving them attributes they don't have.I do know what those words mean, and right now the Jazz don't have a real initiator other than Collier, who can't shoot.
Kon isn't an initiator though. Idk why you insist on hyping up prospects by giving them attributes they don't have.