What's new

Get off our plane! Now!

Good retort. I don't think airlines would be hurting for money if they stopped overbooking. Hell, would save money sometimes since they wouldn't have to pay people to get off the flight.

Dude, they hire mathematicians to figure this out and be as precise as possible. They don't "wing" it.
They would not make more money. If they would then they would. They don't kick people off cuz they think it's funny to ****ing with their passengers.
 
It's the only way for airlines to make money?


They're literally milking it.





https://airinsight.com/2016/08/18/us-airline-industry-highly-profitable/

Either way the prices of a ticket would go up. Either from subsidies or from you paying more. I prefer the airlines trying to be more effective and make more money. Especially where it very very rarely has negative consequences and has a lot of positives. Including greatly reducing the price of tickets.

Its fine you disagree with me @Onelove if you think the airlines should have not called the police when he ran onto the plane without a ticket that is fine. I dont see any situations where you go anywhere that requires a ticket and run past security and refuse to leave that the police or security will not be called on you. How the police handled it is a separate discussion, one in which I am more neutral on and have no strong opinions on.

Here is a link for subsidized flying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/trav...-much-do-taxpayers-support-airlines/71568226/
 
Dude, they hire mathematicians to figure this out and be as precise as possible. They don't "wing" it.
They would not make more money if they would then they would. They don't kick people off cuz they think it's funny to ****ing with their passengers.
I didn't say they would make more silly. I said that they wouldn't be hurting for money if they are making 12 billion per year. I'm not feeling sorry for them.
 
Either way the prices of a ticket would go up. Either from subsidies or from you paying more. I prefer the airlines trying to be more effective and make more money. Especially where it very very rarely has negative consequences.

Its fine you disagree with me @Onelove if you think the airlines should have not called the police when he ran onto the plane without a ticket that is fine. I dont see any situations where you go anywhere that requires a ticket and run past security and refuse to leave that the police or security will not be called on you. How the police handled it is a separate discussion, one in which I am more neutral on and have no strong opinions on.

Here is a link for subsidized flying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/trav...-much-do-taxpayers-support-airlines/71568226/

Why would the price have to go up? Why can't it come off of increased profits?
 
I didn't say they would make more silly. I said that they wouldn't be hurting for money if they are making 12 billion per year. I'm not feeling sorry for them.


Exactly. Their profits increased each year. It can just come off of the increase in profit. That won't affect ticket prices.
 
Is this 12B legit? Is this after all expenses? I thought airlines barely break even. If that.
 
Either way the prices of a ticket would go up. Either from subsidies or from you paying more. I prefer the airlines trying to be more effective and make more money. Especially where it very very rarely has negative consequences.

Its fine you disagree with me @Onelove if you think the airlines should have not called the police when he ran onto the plane without a ticket that is fine. I dont see any situations where you go anywhere that requires a ticket and run past security and refuse to leave that the police or security will not be called on you. How the police handled it is a separate discussion, one in which I am more neutral on and have no strong opinions on.

Here is a link for subsidized flying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/trav...-much-do-taxpayers-support-airlines/71568226/
Do you think it would be a good idea for the airline to tell their customers when the next flight is when making the offer to the volunteers so that they are not surprised to be finding that they can't get on another plane until the next day?

Would that be to courteous of them?
 
I didn't say they would make more silly. I said that they wouldn't be hurting for money if they are making 12 billion per year. I'm not feeling sorry for them.

How about all the people that they had to lay off last decade when the price of fuel exploded, did you feel bad for them?

They could raise prices, less people would fly and fewer would work. Not exactly a win win
 
How about all the people that they had to lay off last decade when the price of fuel exploded, did you feel bad for them?
Yes
 
Back
Top