What's new

GOP Debate Threads

"How stupid are the people of Iowa?" Trump asked. "How stupid are the people of the country to believe this crap?

That is what Donald Trump said to an audience in Iowa, while presumably stumping for their votes. Carson leads Trump in recent polls of Iowa Republican voters. So Trump has, of late, spent some time on the attack. But reasonable people have to wonder what, exactly, was Trump really doing Thursday?

Yes, this is how you win the votes of the people of Iowa. By asking them "how stupid are the people of Iowa?" Brilliant strategy, The Donald. Brilliant ploy. That'll get 'em on your side.
Trumps appeal has been that he says what he thinks, unfiltered. He has no fear of the consequences for speaking his mind, mostly because he has lived in an environment where he does not have to face those consequences. I'm pretty sure the reason he made these comments is that they are what he actually thinks. If he is defeated at the polls it will prove to him that people really are as stupid as he is saying they are. Ironically, if he is elected at the polls it will also prove to him that people really are as stupid as he is saying they are.
 
The difference between those two groups of people is that you are supportive of the policies of the left and against the policies of the right, so when you hear someone on the right state their beliefs you equate it with stupidity. If the left has done one thing successfully it is paint their opponents as idiots. The irony is that the solutions of the left are theoretical. They present their ideas as Utopian but again and again they don't work in the real world. We have unfortunately had a front row seat to a demonstration of this over the last seven years. Obama/Biden ran on a platform of Hope and Change. They told us that their policies would reduce racism, decrease the cost and increase the availability of health care, reduce poverty, close the income gap, reduce the deficit, restore respect for America, make the world a safer place and much more. Again and again and again the real world implementation of these policies has resulted in the opposite outcome from the one we were promised.

The liberal response to this outcome is to double down on their failed policies. They are certain that their theoretical solutions would work if given enough time and free reign. Socialism, to them, appears to be such a panacea. It looks so fair. If only everyone would get on board. If only people wouldn't always be looking for ways to game the system.

Unfortunately the reality is that one of the keys to capitalism is the recognition that each individual is driven to put him/herself and their family in the best possible situation. We are not a hill of ants. We are a collection of individuals who are more concerned about our own needs more than we are about the needs of society as a whole. This is reality, and it is even reality for the most altruistic among us. The ability to get ahead is the very foundation of the American Dream. A system that embraces and exploits this dynamic was the key to this countries exceptionalism.

I do not have any difficulty understanding why the socialistic ideal is so appealing to so many people, but I know that in practice it has never worked and it never will work because it completely overlooks who we are and what motivates us. Socialistic systems are destined to fail every time because the more you reward people at a level of mediocrity, the more they will choose to perform at a level of mediocrity. The more they perform at mediocrity the less money that comes into the system for redistribution. The theoretical application of socialism and communism sound so just, but because of the way human motivation works these sorts of societies are simply no match for capitalism.

Capitalistic America >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialistic America

Norway. Sweden. Canada. Australia. England. All failing according to jobag.
 
Norway. Sweden. Canada. Australia. England. All failing according to jobag.
My uncle is a very successful businessman in Calgary. He and his entire family travel to the US every time they need medical care, even though their coverage is free in Canada. Why do you think they do that?
 
Trumps appeal has been that he says what he thinks, unfiltered. He has no fear of the consequences for speaking his mind, mostly because he has lived in an environment where he does not have to face those consequences. I'm pretty sure the reason he made these comments is that they are what he actually thinks. If he is defeated at the polls it will prove to him that people really are as stupid as he is saying they are. Ironically, if he is elected at the polls it will also prove to him that people really are as stupid as he is saying they are.

Trump's strengths:

1. He speaks his mind, unfiltered. Since this is essentially anti-politician, it certainly will appeal.

2. In the midst of such things as the "culture wars", the fears associated with immigration, and the fears associated with terrorism and never ending wars, nothing like a little fear mongering demagoguery to appeal to large swaths of the population. Demagougues thrive in the climate present in America today. And I see The Donald as a demagogue, stoking fear, appealing to fear.

3. He takes advantage of Reality TV as a new standard for leadership selection. Back in the 1830's, in his book Democracy in America, Frenchmen Alexis de Toqueville observed that in America, in a nation with such a broad social democracy, it would not be the creame rising to the top. It would be the mediocre.
Granted, The Donald is a highly successful man by American standards. Manna is everything here, after all. Just my opinion, but I see Trump as a good example of the mediocre rising to the top. An accessment that may apply to the whole damn lot of them. The Republican race seems like an episode of Reality TV. Maybe our entire political process is an episode of Reality TV....
 
My uncle is a very successful businessman in Calgary. He and his entire family travel to the US every time they need medical care, even though their coverage is free in Canada. Why do you think they do that?

Because they are financially and ideologically irresponsible?
 
My uncle is a very successful businessman in Calgary. He and his entire family travel to the US every time they need medical care, even though their coverage is free in Canada. Why do you think they do that?

He is in the strong, strong minority then. Care to share the specifics of what care this is? "every time"? Lmfao. You are blind bro. USA! USA!
 
My family lived the American Dream because we moved to Canada. Would not have been possible if we moved to the US. Shoutout to my parents.
 
He is in the strong, strong minority then. Care to share the specifics of what care this is? "every time"? Lmfao. You are blind bro. USA! USA!
First, how come when I reply to this quote text shows up that was invisible in your original?

Second, I am not privy to my uncle's medical records but he has a son with serious health concerns. He believes that the care is quicker and better in America. He has a number of friends who feel the same so I have a feeling this minority is not as small as you believe.

Third, some people seem to believe that government should be like a parent who oversees everything. I believe that in general when government gets involved the process gets less efficient and more costly.
 
Third, some people seem to believe that government should be like a parent who oversees everything. I believe that in general when government gets involved the process gets less efficient and more costly.

Do conservative people believe that when otherwise normal, competent people get elected that their heads fall off? How is it that conservatives feel they are allergic to being governed?
 
Back
Top