What's new
By:

HA! Kanter being shopped for cap space (for Horford)

Cappy_Smurf said:
I don't know what size shoe you are, or if you've ever tried fitting it into your mouth, but you might wanna think about investing in a shoe horn.

Mozgov just got 4 years 64 million from Lakers(haha). This FA period is about to go bonkers, and next year will be even more nuts. As much as we hate Enes, that contract will be just fine, and yes, tradeable.
Click to expand...
Tradeable for what though? Do you think they will get good value back or it will be a salary dump?
 
makes sense.

Kanter is eating up quite a lot of cap space for a bench player. You don't just throw the max around to every player.

OKC had no choice though...Kanter made them better in some aspects, but I know they would dump him if any better options came back.
 
fishonjazz said:
Tradeable for what though? Do you think they will get good value back or it will be a salary dump?
Click to expand...

$18.5M (includes the trade kicker) for a player who had to be benched in the most important game in OKC's season. Every GM knows he's the worst defending big in the league. I'll be surprised if they can dump him. Plus, he can say no to any trade right now.
 
SCS said:
It's literally 15 and 7 for Horford compared to 13 and 8 for Kanter. And Horford plays 11 more mpg. Horford is the better player because he can defend. I don't see how anything I said was flawed logic. But whatevs. My main point was that them being able to sign Horford is unlikely.
Click to expand...

Well ya see, he's good at passing, defense, spacing the court, not holding onto the ball, general basketball IQ.

Those are things that Kanter isn't just bad at, but awful at, sans spacing.
 
Yeah. If the Blazers really wanted him last year, you'd have to figure that they'd be banging the drum to acquire him now that they have cap space.

Still, that's a pretty expensive bluff. If that was their intent, I'd have loved it if OKC would have failed to match. Can you imagine the reaction in their war room? They go from laughing to crying.
 
#bern said:
Well ya see, he's good at passing, defense, spacing the court, not holding onto the ball, general basketball IQ.

Those are things that Kanter isn't just bad at, but awful at, sans spacing.
Click to expand...

Which is why I said Horford is a better player :confused:

People keep veering away from my main point though which was this rumor doesn't add up. The Thunder would need to move Kanter (which would be hard because of his no trade clause which is in effect until the 12th) plus Kyle Singler plus renouncing free agents and maybe trading a few others to outbid anyone for Horford. Which doesn't make sense when they just picked up Domantas Sabonis, and have Steven Adams already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top