What's new

Hawks want Quin

That is crazy if true. Do you have an article that says that?
He signed a guaranteed contract my dude. You dont need an article to tell you obvious facts.

Utah didnt want to bring him back just to coach a single year with a new group so they told him to stay home.
 
He signed a guaranteed contract my dude. You dont need an article to tell you obvious facts.

Utah didnt want to bring him back just to coach a single year with a new group so they told him to stay home.
It gets better because I think they were even fine bringing him back and he was like "nah I'm good". You wouldn't want to force a guy to coach but its still wild he can basically walk away and the org feels they have to pay him.

So Quin getting off the payroll will save Ryan some dough and Hawks might send a few bucks our way. We won't get anything and I'm fine with it... cuz Quin will get to deal with Trae which is a punishment in its own special way.
 
Where on Earth are you pulling that from? They are just giving him more power as part of the draw of getting him to sign.
Its a ****** job... they'd have to give him the bag and the loudest voice in the room or he waits for something better (I'd probably wait because I think the Trae Young thing ends badly).
 
Where on Earth are you pulling that from? They are just giving him more power as part of the draw of getting him to sign.
Someone on Hawks board said it. I dont know the rules at all, but the source was questionnable hence the "supposedly" and the "(?)" at the end... in case someone knows how it actually goes.
 
It gets better because I think they were even fine bringing him back and he was like "nah I'm good". You wouldn't want to force a guy to coach but its still wild he can basically walk away and the org feels they have to pay him.

So Quin getting off the payroll will save Ryan some dough and Hawks might send a few bucks our way. We won't get anything and I'm fine with it... cuz Quin will get to deal with Trae which is a punishment in its own special way.
Ehh, I doubt they really wanted him back on a 1 year deal and they saw an opportunity to get Hardy. If they didnt, Hardy would be the HC of the Boston Celtics currently. It worked out for both sides.
 
Someone on Hawks board said it. I dont know the rules at all, but the source was questionnable hence the "supposedly" and the "(?)" at the end... in case someone knows how it actually goes.
I think we all know you can't trust those Hawks morons though... Member when we were going to trade Lauri for John Collins... but maybe we'd have to give up a pick to do it.
 
Ehh, I doubt they really wanted him back on a 1 year deal and they saw an opportunity to get Hardy. If they didnt, Hardy would be the HC of the Boston Celtics currently. It worked out for both sides.
Who knows what the discussions were behind closed doors and the Jazz may have said they'd have him back in order to get some sort of financial consideration or something. We are obviously better off right now with Hardy under contract for a while so I have no problem with how it worked out. Just think my dream is to have one of these guaranteed contracts and to be told to take a walk... with no change on the 1st and 15th. It would be a dream to get the DL treatment.
 
Yeah I dont trust them, hence the questionmarks. Still gonna keep spying on them.
by all means continue...

I just think they are dumb if they think his contract that he is still under with the Jazz is somehow voided if he gets a "different position".
 
Back
Top