If you have too many good players that are appropriately paid, then trading them isn't that big of a problem. Overpaying players creates a domino-effect of other problems (stuck with underperforming players which makes it difficult to pay players you actually want to keep).
I really, really hope this is a bunch of non-sense. I'd rather let Hayward walk for nothing than pay him the max. Absence of an asset > a negative asset.
I really, really hope this is a bunch of non-sense. I'd rather let Hayward walk for nothing than pay him the max. Absence of an asset > a negative asset.