What's new
By:

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

Eenie-Meenie said:
Left leaning news would never report Tulsi as a Russian agent. Leftists oppose all autocratic rulers like Putin, and Trump. Contrary to what some conservatives on here think, rulers like Trump, Putin, Clinton, Obama, and the Bushes have common interests -- financial gain for the Deep State.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. They are doing exactly that.

She is getting smeared because she is more center. She reminds them of too much right because they are so far left. The left is so far gone that they way out on an island. Anyone who isnt out there on crazy island they will attack. Hell, they even attack each other. Thats the mark of the left. They cant help themselves. Just like they will kill their own babies they will also eat their own.
 
Jazzta said:
To the greatest extent, the more that is spoken about her the better, and the more the war faction of the Dem party gets exposed. The way I see it there’s one common enemy to the left and the right.

Russian agent, what’s next, ties to Hitler? What an effin joke the Dem party has become, with Hillary’s despicable and totally unfounded accusations. I’m so done with it.
Click to expand...

Two weeks ago you claimed that Russia didn’t interfere in the 2016 election. You even described it as a hoax. Are you sure you should be talking right now about Russia potentially interfering in yet another election? You dismissing Clinton’s concerns is like an anti-vaxxer dismissing the need for vaccine research.
 
The Thriller said:
Two weeks ago you claimed that Russia didn’t interfere in the 2016 election. You even described it as a hoax. Are you sure you should be talking right now about Russia potentially interfering in yet another election? You dismissing Clinton’s concerns is like an anti-vaxxer dismissing the need for vaccine research.
Click to expand...

Anti-vaxxer, Trump supporter, Russia apologist, anything else? The **** do vaccines have to do with this? And yes I dismiss any concern coming from such a shady character. Get away with that garbage lol
 
Jazzta said:
Anti-vaxxer, Trump supporter, Russia apologist, anything else? The **** do vaccines have to do with this? And yes I dismiss any concern coming from such a shady character. Get away with that garbage lol
Click to expand...

Just remember that you’re talking to someone that wants you to financially suffer for your impudence of not falling in line. Approach any conversation with him with that in mind.
 
The Thriller said:
She’s consistently in the bottom 3 polling between 0-2 percent because she’s not popular among democrats. Not enough to win the nomination but she can use her platform and candidacy to hurt Democrats and re-elect Trump. Pulling **** like this probably isn’t going to help her popularity among Democrats:





And... that makes you giddy?
Click to expand...

Is this really an argument you’re supporting? Because it’s kind of funny. If we’re going to approach it as an either/or, we have someone who’s running for President. Let’s say you’re in her shoes; how are you stratifying your time commitments — by going on a show of an individual that has 2.8M followers, or another who has just under 80k (somewhere in the vicinity of David Locke)?
 
infection said:
Is this really an argument you’re supporting? Because it’s kind of funny. If we’re going to approach it as an either/or, we have someone who’s running for President. Let’s say you’re in her shoes; how are you stratifying your time commitments — by going on a show of an individual that has 2.8M followers, or another who has just under 80k (somewhere in the vicinity of David Locke)?
Click to expand...

You think more Democrats watch Tucker Carlson than tune into a liberal radio show? Is that the argument you’re supporting? If you’re trying to win the Democratic nomination, you think declining a liberal radio show and putting a rally on hold for one hour to appear on White Nationalist Hour is a winning strategy?

hmmm
 
The Thriller said:
You think more Democrats watch Tucker Carlson than tune into a liberal radio show? Is that the argument you’re supporting? If you’re trying to win the Democratic nomination, you think declining a liberal radio show and putting a rally on hold for one hour to appear on White Nationalist Hour is a winning strategy?

hmmm
Click to expand...
Absolutely much fewer Democrats watching Tucker (per viewer). How about by volume? Also, we’re talking about her going on Tucker, right? People obviously know about it, right? So they’re familiar with it. How many people would be familiar with her going on this dude’s show?
 


Tulsi willing to sellout her country but has too much integrity to lie.
 
I predict this McCarthyism will undue a lot of the hard work people have put into Trump-Russia narrative for the past few years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top