Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!

[One Brow]

Footage with no anomalies and movements consistent with lunar gravity would convince me

My grandfather's home movies taken in the 1960s and 1970s all had anomalies. You're taking about film that went through severe g-forces and mild radiation twice. That standard is unrealistic and unreasonable.

Post something you consider to be proof that they went and we can talk about whether it's really proof.

I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm just checking to see if you are a reasonable person, and you are not. I'm good.

 

[Archie Moses]

They've actually studied this. A small percentage can be swayed by unopposed disinformation.

So, basically, I was right.

I'm not shocked.

 

[Cosmored]

idiculous statement. There are 842lbs of lunar samples, examined by the world's finest geologists. Samples that show no signs of terrestrial weathering, copious amounts of solar isotopes, no fusion crusts, signs of formation in low gravity, bone dry and impossible to fake. There are hundreds of pieces of footage that demonstrate lighting, lunar gravity and overall motion that is impossible to replicate on Earth. Footage with dark skies, massive evenly lit terrain and only one single light. Every single time anything is presented to you, you become the worst troll on the web with denial.

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/28_moon-stones-from-Earth-ENGL.html
(excerpt)
------------------------------
"Moonstones" have no possibility to be compared on moon itself, because there is no possibility of a neutral control on the "moon". So, it's permitted for anybody to claim this or that stone would come from the "moon". Also when certain "moon probes" are said having landed on the moon also this is not controllable. And it's not possible to control if these "moon probes" have brought stones or dust from the "moon" to the Earth or not either. At the end the super powers "USA" and "SU" claim together to the public that "moonstones" would be "very similar" to "Earth stones". This "similarity" brings up some new questions (Wisnewski, p.209).
-----------------------------

MoonFaker: Exhibit D. PART 5.​

MoonFaker: Rocks & Crocks. PART 1.​

MoonFaker: Moon Rocks Revisited. Episode 1, Water In Apollo Samples. PART 1​

We don't know where those rocks came from. We can't believe what we read.

The media lies SO MUCH - and stupid Americans chat the lies furiously

How many times have you heard there has always been a "peaceful orderly transfer of power" after an election? They chat it, repeat it, over and over...

www.politicalforum.com

 

[Dances With Clowns]

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/28_moon-stones-from-Earth-ENGL.html

As part of your wall of spam you just look for anything without reading or understanding it. Basically a webpage written by an imbecile:

The Apollo Moon Rocks - Idiotic Website

A ridiculous and thoroughly ignorant website: The following website is used by the serial forum spammer because he thinks it actually offers...

debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

The whole website utterly destroyed. Of course Cosmo won't be offering any rebuttal and regardless of how that website has been taken apart will use it again without any thought about its legitimacy!

Oh, the other crap about Jarrah White:

The Apollo Moon Rocks - Part 1

I wonder which version of the word "plausible" you are referring to. I would suggest the one bolded below. plau·si·ble (plôz-bl) adj....

debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

The Apollo Moon Rocks - Part 2

Assertion 4 - Materials not found in Earth rocks are common to meteorites Now the sideways shuffle is implied. He has so far, indicated th...

debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

The Apollo Moon Rocks - Part 3

Assertion 7 - Nasa's moon rocks have different elements and isotopes Here we have a statement that shows a complete lack of understanding ...

debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

The Apollo Moon Rocks - Part 4

Assertion 12 - Smart-1 uncovered minerals and rocks different to nasa rocks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHJ_7FtiCBE "Jarrah claims th...

debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

Show me ANYWHERE you have responded to any of that rebuttal to your spam!

 

[Dances With Clowns]

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/28_moon-stones-from-Earth-ENGL.html
"Moonstones" have no possibility to be compared on moon itself, because there is no possibility of a neutral control on the "moon". So, it's permitted for anybody to claim this or that stone would come from the "moon". Also when certain "moon probes" are said having landed on the moon also this is not controllable. And it's not possible to control if these "moon probes" have brought stones or dust from the "moon" to the Earth or not either. At the end the super powers "USA" and "SU" claim together to the public that "moonstones" would be "very similar" to "Earth stones". This "similarity" brings up some new questions (Wisnewski, p.209).

This has been moved below because Cosmo has completely ignored it.

 

[Cosmored]

I'd better post this again.

The media lies SO MUCH - and stupid Americans chat the lies furiously

How many times have you heard there has always been a "peaceful orderly transfer of power" after an election? They chat it, repeat it, over and over...

www.politicalforum.com

All the info you post about the rocks has been from mainstream sources. We have not idea whether or not any of that info is real, or bogus. The rocks are not proof and they don't make the anomalies that are indeed proof go away.

I already pointed out some evidence that Betamax is a shill. Your ignoring it doesn't make it go away. The viewers still see it.

 

[Cosmored]

Number 1: This shows a sequence where the reflection from the Sun is blocked out completely by a very narrow rod. This 100% refutes the stupid claim that it was some sort of massive light.

Number 2: Demonstrates 100% that as the light levels in the camera are altered by aperture, so does the size of the blooming on the visor.

Physics of the Moon Reflection

Physics of the Moon Reflection

Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.

www.brighteon.com

The Mystery of the Apollo Sun

The Mystery of the Apollo Sun

Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.

www.brighteon.com

Why is the Sun so Big? | AULIS Online – Different Thinking

www.aulis.com

 

[Dances With Clowns]

I'd better post this again.
All the info you post about the rocks has been from mainstream sources. We have not idea whether or not any of that info is real, or bogus. The rocks are not proof and they don't make the anomalies that are indeed proof go away.

I already pointed out some evidence that Betamax is a shill. Your ignoring it doesn't make it go away. The viewers still see it.

You disgraceful spammer. You have no intention of reasoned debate. Now you make one clueless association and use it as an absurd generalisation then suggest that your absurdity discounts the testimony of probably a thousand or so geologists who have studied the rocks.

Whistleblowers, governments and lies.

Actually what she says is that the scientists who worked at the company she worked at, sold out for money. To use somebody talking ...

debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

"This section of the "wall of spam" highlights two points that massively contradict each other.
We have the premise that scientists and governments lie, "demonstrated" with whistleblowers and articles written and spoken by numerous individuals very much alive. We then have the premise that nobody would speak out about Apollo because they would fear for their lives! BUNKUM!"

Any lurkers or fence sitters can see your pathetic attempts to avoid any evidence presented to you!

Let's examine what the samples show and determine whether that guarantees their authenticity.

There is no terrestrial weathering on any of the samples. Basically the samples show no interaction with standing water, atmospheric water, atmospheric gases or any vegetation or animal. This is completely impossible to fake with an Earth rock.

The samples are loaded with a whole host of solar isotopes so cannot possibly be from Earth, this leaves the other equally ignorant claim that they are meteorites. Now meteorites lose most of their mass on entry to Earth's atmosphere, so Apollo samples that show a slim layer of Helium-3 on their exteriors from shallow solar wind penetration could not possibly survive. The samples also show signs of micro-meteorite impacts on their outsides called zap-pits. Again stripped off from atmospheric entry.

There is no heat damage to any sample from this entry process, zero terrestrial weathering from time spent on the surface and signs within the samples - volcanic spherules that show formation in low gravity.

In short, hundreds of geologists say they confirm they are from the Moon for many decades of study across multiple countries.

I anticipate no meaningful response to this because Cosmo know jack about any of this!

 

[Cosmored]

Number 3: This shows a clear parabolic arc of dust between John Young's boots that is 100% irrefutably rising and falling at the same time as he is. PROVING that he must be on the Moon.

No it doesn't. It shows that he's on a wire.

The Apollo Moon Jump Salute Refute hd

The Apollo Moon Jump Salute Refute hd

Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.

www.brighteon.com

Galileo and the Apollo Moon Jump

Galileo and the Apollo Moon Jump

Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.

www.brighteon.com

 

[Dances With Clowns]

Physics of the Moon Reflection

The Mystery of the Apollo Sun

Debunked spam. The animated gif above completely closes the case. The reflection disappears when a narrow rod moves in front of it.

Again, the blog you completely ignore tears your claims to shreds.

The "Superlight" contention

The Contention:- Before I begin disassembling this over blown nonsense, I want to quickly touch on something pertaining to the person w...

debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

 

[Cosmored]

Number 4: This is a clear indicator of simultaneous soil dropping at the same speed as the jumper. This is 100% proof he is on the Moon.

I already dealt with this and you just ignored it. The viewers still see it and it's pretty clear that this thread of his is willful deceit on his part.

Gene Cernan jump proves they are on the Moon

The following gif was found on the internet and is part of a sequence famous for Gene Cernan hopping along on the Moon. There are clowns on the...

www.politicalforum.com

Number 5:
This animation is the supposed "duplicate" background claim from the SFS. It shows that the distant mountains are actually just viewed from a more rotated vantage point. He actually denied that they are different and from obviously different places.

The viewers can decide for themselves.
http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

 

[Dances With Clowns]

No it doesn't. It shows that he's on a wire.

The parabolic arc moves in the same way and speed as his jump. Unless the dust is on a wire you are lying - just for a change!

Every single thing you post is getting completely destroyed, how can you be that deluded not to see it??