Championship this year. Can’t get any better than that.
Even basketball aside, you look at a team making desperate moves to get somewhere where they, apparently, believe they can get under the tax. An OPJ for Mike deal shaved off an easy $5M. So any health concerns about OPJ would be negated by that... plus the fact that Conley missed more than a third of the season last year.You brought up a bunch of good points infection - and I agree your roster is better on paper.
That being said, it's been reported the Jazz pursued the route they did because they estimate that cohesiveness is going to be more important in this COVID season - much like it was during the bubble. Teams are back to playing 4 games in 5 nights this year, and the Jazz are interested in guys who don't need to learn the playbook. That's why they are rolling the dice with Miye Oni, Favors, Juwan Morgan. They also said it's not just the xs and os that they know but the fact the Jazz medical team knows the players and how their bodies respond to things as well as having a group that will rally around each other.
With that in mind, I'd be higher on Roberson and Shaq than OPJ. Especially given the extensive injury history that all 3 of them have. But, like I said, I agree with your roster. If I were the GM that's probably exactly the kind of moves I would have made. We'll watch this season, and see who was correct us or Justin Zanik/DL.
One caveat I might add. I wouldn't totally rule out the possibility of the Jazz trading Mike Conley before MLK day. I think if they do make a move, they would want to do it with enough time left for the new player/players to become integrated. The rumored Conley for Griffin + Derrick Rose is exactly the type of trade that might RAISE the Jazz ceiling, but at the same time potentially lower our floor. But, if Conley wants to get 30 ppg so he can go big into free agency and his next contract - Detroit would be just the place to do it.
No, they should be thinking about trading Conley. Bogey is on a longer deal and his game will age fine.Should the jazz think about trading Bogey?
Here is another thing that nobody is talking about but may kill us: defensive rebounding in the crunch.
The common retort about the eyeball test saying that we’re bad at rebounding is the stats that show that we’re a good rebounding team. But this is too misleading. In the aggregate, we do fine over 48 minutes in terms of total rebounds. But in the crunch it’s a different story. I mentioned above that Crowder defensively became Bojan. Jae and Ricky combined for 18% TRB% while with us. Last year Conley and Bojan combined for 13%. But even this doesn’t really matter because we still struggled with this same issue then, but we’ve exacerbated it this year for the following couple of reasons:
1. Crowder wasn’t a great rebounder by any stretch of the imagination, but Bojan is worse. Same for Rubio and Conley.
2. The idea in the crunch is that Rudy has to step up and apply pressure and show force when the ball-handler moves into the lane. He is good at this, but it takes him out of rebounding position, and so if/when they miss, which is likely because of his defense, there are a lot of opportunities for the other team to grab offensive rebounds. Crowder couldn’t keep them off the boards, but Bojan is worse.
3. Bojan and Conley are worse defenders than Ricky and Jae. This forces more pressure on Rudy to contest and clean up, leading to more problems in #2 and less ability to actual close the possession without the other team scoring. The other problem is the adjustments that the rest of the league has already made on us, knowing that once Rudy comes out to contest, the rim is open season for anyone else.
When Favors plays with Gobert, it alleviates this problem, because Rudy is able to contest freely without having to worry about surrendering the rim for an alley-oop and doesn’t have to worry about not having backup on the glass. This will help us during the first 42 minutes of the game, but also won’t be that pressing because Rudy won’t have to be as aggressively contesting as he does in crunch time. Favors won’t be playing much crunch, and even so doing imposes its own challenges.
That would be one advantage of a rebounding 4 like a Kevin Love. But, more importantly, would have been a nice role for a Christian Wood.
This is a problem we will still have. It’s not an issue we’ve addressed, and it’s not really an issue that my roster above with OPJ addresses. But this is a weakness the league has increasingly exploited, and all it really takes a a 6’4” hustle guy to know that he just needs to get in there for a putback once Rudy contests in the lane.
Rudy can work all kinds of defensive miracles, but if we give up the putback then it’s all for naught and our entire defensive strategy is just flashy but ineffective. The funny thing is that 12 years ago some people here (Sloanfeld?) would argue that Boozer wasn’t a bad defender because of his defensive rebounds, and how defensive rebounds were a measure of defense because they complete the defensive possession. It really is amazing, ironic, and karma-laden, that our defensive woes currently are indeed in large part due to not being able to “complete” that defensive possession with a defensive rebound.
Boozer FTW!