1) It is highly unlikely such a scenario would present itself for atleast another year
2) If it does - at that time we all (hopefully) will have a much better understanding of the type of players Favors & Kanter are in a major roles.
We'll know if Favors' offensive game is still trending upward, or if his defensive ability renders any offensive defficiencies irrellevant. We'll know if Kanter can be a high-efficiency inside-outside scorer who is not a defensive liability for the Jazz in a full-time role.
At this point - it's impossible to choose one of the other especially when it's not even remotely necessary. I suppose it's fun for some to think about but for me - I know the Jazz have alot more real problems & question-marks to deal with than this one.
Haha! Well, both of them are still far too young and inexperienced to contribute so why not trade them both and bring back some veteran bigs who can play 35 minutes per night without getting "beat up" (as Dennis Lindsey has said).Man up and make the hypothetical choice. TIA.
Haha! Well, both of them are still far too young and inexperienced to contribute so why not trade them both and bring back some veteran bigs who can play 35 minutes per night without getting "beat up" (as Dennis Lindsey has said).
1) It is highly unlikely such a scenario would present itself for atleast another year
2) If it does - at that time we all (hopefully) will have a much better understanding of the type of players Favors & Kanter are in a major roles.
At this point - it's impossible to choose one of the other especially when it's not even remotely necessary. I suppose it's fun for some to think about but for me - I know the Jazz have alot more real problems & question-marks to deal with than this one.
pick the cheese option then.I want to go with BIG-AL, but he is missing at the poll.
pick the cheese option then.
big al is as soft as cheese