Hill is 100% a floor general, at least he was with Utah.The floor general argument is baseless though. Last year the offense was better with Ricky off the floor. When we had Hill the offense was much better... he’s not a traditional pg... good shooter and very low turnover. We had Hayward who could play make as well as Ingles.
The offensive issues are exaggerated because everyone is shooting below their prior year averages on catch and shoot threes... but this particular slump for Ricky has me thinking that we shouldn’t consider this the long term fit. I just think we can be intentional about how we build. It’s clear Ricky was brought in at the advice of Gordon... we worked around it but it wasn’t the ideal fit. Per Andy Larsen... we had a good read on a deal for Lowry if we scrapped the Hayward pursuit... we had a deal for Bledsoe lined up but Gordon didn’t want to play with him.
Like if Ricky was still in Minny would he be a guy we’d go and get if we have the same basic core? I think that’d be a pretty clear no.
The offense runs better with Rubio. That doesnt mean the offense always produces better results with Rubio. He obviously gets in his own way with his deficiencies. When he is playing at his best he is a giant positive to the offense. Last season in 2018 the Jazz were a +7.2 with Rubio on offense and +1.9 on defense.
But I'm not making the argument for Rubio. I'm making an argument for a floor general type so Mitchell doesn't feed into his own worst tendencies, because you should maximize your best player's strengths, not try to turn them into something they aren't. Maxing out his usage rate is a TERRIBLE idea.