What's new

Is my private message banned?

Nate505 said:
I can only answer for myself. Your post seem far more mean spirited and specifically directed at his girlfriend, and other people have attacked her in the past for no f'ing reason whatsoever and it personally irritates the hell out of me. I see you make the claim you didn't target her specifically, but that's not how the three of us who voted felt. If the other two feel like replying and explaining their vote they are more than welcome, but there's my explanation.

You're also free to report anything you want. And I don't know why your PM doesn't work, but I'll pass it on to Colton/Jason.

But I never specifically directed it at anyone any more than he directed it at my freinds. Can you explain how they are different? Why is mine anymore mean spirited than him calling my friends idiots and saying what I have to say is WORTHLESS!!!???!!! I get more scrutiny becuase OTHER people in the past have made fun of his girl friend???? I have no idea whether my statements were ACCURATE just like he has no idea if HIS were!!!
 
FWIW I have seen far worse things said about people in here that ended in the post not being edited and presumably no infraction. I went back and read the interchange and find it interesting that kicky was indeed the first to hurl a personal insult (unless in some way kicky felt insulted by JS saying "pseudo-intellectual douche atheists" or whatever). Technically kicky insulted JS's friends, which is not a lot different than insulting a girlfriend. His friends might be the most important people in his life. JS's response about fat ugly chicks seemed to be the standard internet tough guy exchange and I just skimmed it the first time, attributing it to simple immaturity. He didn't carry on with it other than kicky going right back at it, so it was part of an exchange. I passed over most of what both of them were saying as it seemed to be more of a grade-school squabble than anything else.

Seems that in fairness if JS reports kicky's first comment then kicky should also get an infraction, since he is essence did the same thing, unless there is indeed bias on the moderating staff.

I still think the whole thing between both of them belongs in the 3rd grade, but that's just me.
 
I can get things but when try to send them it says I'm full or something!!! I even deleted a bunch of private messages and it still won't let me send. That's why I wondered if it got banned.

Odd. Deleting a lot of old messages is probably a good thing to do. Maybe you've got a bunch in the "Sent Items" folder so it can't send any new ones.

If you'd like, I can log in as you to see what I can find. That would require resetting your password, though, then (after I'm done) emailing you at the email address you used to register for the site with a new password. You'd then be able to reset the new password to what it is now. Let me know if you'd like me to do that. (You wouldn't be able to log in during the time I was logged in as you.)
 
Odd. Deleting a lot of old messages is probably a good thing to do. Maybe you've got a bunch in the "Sent Items" folder so it can't send any new ones.

If you'd like, I can log in as you to see what I can find. That would require resetting your password, though, then (after I'm done) emailing you at the email address you used to register for the site with a new password. You'd then be able to reset the new password to what it is now. Let me know if you'd like me to do that. (You wouldn't be able to log in during the time I was logged in as you.)

This is the same thing they did to Vinylone, and how about that, he hasn't been seen since.
 
FWIW I have seen far worse things said about people in here that ended in the post not being edited and presumably no infraction. I went back and read the interchange and find it interesting that kicky was indeed the first to hurl a personal insult (unless in some way kicky felt insulted by JS saying "pseudo-intellectual douche atheists" or whatever). Technically kicky insulted JS's friends, which is not a lot different than insulting a girlfriend. His friends might be the most important people in his life. JS's response about fat ugly chicks seemed to be the standard internet tough guy exchange and I just skimmed it the first time, attributing it to simple immaturity. He didn't carry on with it other than kicky going right back at it, so it was part of an exchange. I passed over most of what both of them were saying as it seemed to be more of a grade-school squabble than anything else.

Seems that in fairness if JS reports kicky's first comment then kicky should also get an infraction, since he is essence did the same thing, unless there is indeed bias on the moderating staff.

I still think the whole thing between both of them belongs in the 3rd grade, but that's just me.

Go and read the JS burn, and tell me that the reasoning you just cooked up doesn't look like someone responding to a shove by pulling a knife and trying to stab someone. JS comment was totally over the line, and if someone can't see that I don't know what to tell them.

But sure, let justice prevail. Maybe Kicky should get some kind of punishment.
 
NUMBERICA:would you mind explaining what to you is so easy to see? I made a statement about a group of people I know nothing about, just like he did. Is it just that mine was about physical appearance and his was about intellect and worth? If so, please see my thread entitled "Physical appearance vs. Intelligence: A Serious Question." And please share your thoughts on why you believe it is more acceptable to insult someone's intellect more than their physicals appearance. Doesn't the fact that HIS comment was UNPROVOKED mean anything? If your shove/knife analogy fits is it really so much worse to defend yourself then to attack for NO REASON????!!!??!?!?!?
 
Oh. My. Hell. Here we go again. Somebody else thinks they're being treated unfairly. Imagine that. It's like constantly dealing with 5 year olds.
 
catratcho said:
Oh. My. Hell. Here we go again. Somebody else thinks they're being treated unfairly. Imagine that. It's like constantly dealing with 5 year olds.

I think I have a legitimate beef here. I've been infracted twice for responding to attacks with the same attacks. How is that fair? BOTH times I have been told that part of the reason was that the person who initially attacked me had been attacked before. So basically I get more punishment because others have mocked these people before...AFTER they mocked me!??!?!?!?!?
 
I think I have a legitimate beef here.

Everyone does. Not everyone starts multiple threads about it though.

I've been infracted twice for responding to attacks with the same attacks.

Actually your other infraction was for trolling. You received a warning (a.k.a. a slap on the wrist) for making a number of offensive and malicious comments about transgendered persons previously. If you're going to complain at least do so accurately.

I will give you the same advice that I give all posters who believe the moderating system is unfair: the internet is a wide world with many options for discussing basketball in the message board format. If you feel that your contributions are not policed fairly here feel free to take them elsewhere.
 
Back
Top