What's new
By:

Jazz and Knicks discussing Donovan Mitchell trade per Shams Charania and Tony Jones

Herro takes another step and he's in the CJ McCollum+ or poor man's Booker type territory. He's 22... he's been doing it on a good team. I get there are some flaws. It's kinda wild we just look right past him in this scenario because we are more intrigued by lesser known prospects.
 
I'm not big on Herro at all. If we did a deal with Miami, I would want to find a 3rd team with more draft assets to send our way.

I still think that the best picks we will have in the next 3-4 years would be our own picks. If we want a top 4 pick, we are going to have to lose our way into top 4 pick consideration.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I prefer a good 3&D player to a scorer who doesnt defend. I want my stars/max players to be more versatile than Herro.

Again, not saying he sucks. I just wouldnt start my rebuild off with a guy as flawed as him. I dont want Don 1.5
Click to expand...
But if you are trading Don 1.0 for Don 1.5 plus three picks, three swaps, and a prospect... and he will be cheaper than Don. Not saying you have to build everything around him but he's an asset and contract status isn't ideal but it has some upside for us if we play it right (there is downside too obvi).
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
But if you are trading Don 1.0 for Don 1.5 plus three picks, three swaps, and a prospect... and he will be cheaper than Don. Not saying you have to build everything around him but he's an asset and contract status isn't ideal but it has some upside for us if we play it right (there is downside too obvi).
Click to expand...
Ok, well he's probably more like Don .75 and I'm good on that.

Just not the style of player I want on my team personally.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:

View: https://twitter.com/spidadmitchell/status/1550149214239326208
Click to expand...

kevin-hart-its-about-to-go-down.gif

Maybe.
 
And I do get that there is a preference towards Grimes player type... but is he going to be as good as say Mikal Bridges? I doubt he's getting to that level... would it be better to have a poor man's Booker or a poor man's Bridges?

If Knicks give 3 unprotected picks, Grimes/Toppin, and 2 other protected picks - I will take that over the Miami package. If they want to pull Grimes and one of the protected picks out (which are kinda the rumorz) then FOH... the Miami deal is better.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Ok, well he's probably more like Don .75 and I'm good on that.

Just not the style of player I want on my team personally.
Click to expand...
I agree, I don't want him long term, but I think it could make sense short term.

I prefer a potential NYK package, but I'm not against the theoretical max offer from the Heat.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
And I do get that there is a preference towards Grimes player type... but is he going to be as good as say Mikal Bridges? I doubt he's getting to that level... would it be better to have a poor man's Booker or a poor man's Bridges?

If Knicks give 3 unprotected picks, Grimes/Toppin, and 2 other protected picks - I will take that over the Miami package. If they want to pull Grimes and one of the protected picks out (which are kinda the rumorz) then FOH... the Miami deal is better.
Click to expand...
I kinda want Grimes just to see if he can develop into a Danny Green type of player. Maybe not a star or even a main starter, but a solid 3&D guy that can help win games down the road.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top