What's new

Jazz are better than the Celtics

Again, I don't think Hayward went there for team success. He went there to make the All Star team and be on TV more.

His registering as a shooting guard for all star consideration seems to confirm this. Shooting guards in the East are really weak.
 
His registering as a shooting guard for all star consideration seems to confirm this. Shooting guards in the East are really weak.

Registering? This isn't voting in primaries. I don't think players register themselves for a position.
 
We need to sponsor a JazzFanz member to get good at League of Legends and completely beat Haywood's *** there too.
 
Registering? This isn't voting in primaries. I don't think players register themselves for a position.

No, your team decides. And they are listing Haywood as a SG even though he is clearly starting as SF. I'm fairly certain Haywood had some input there. . .
 
No, your team decides. And they are listing Haywood as a SG even though he is clearly starting as SF. I'm fairly certain Haywood had some input there. . .

How is he clearly the starting SF when he is starting next to two other SF's (who are both longer than Hayward)? They are correct to list him as the starting SG if he is indeed starting next to Tatum and Brown (though I think they plan to start Morris when he gets healthy).
 
The way Ainge is I wonder if Hayward was smart enough to ask for a no trade clause.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
He played his hand and ended up with; Kyrie, Brown, Hayward, Tatum & Baynes... And he got Hayward for FREE!

or has he still to play his hand??

I wouldn't call Hayward free......
 
The way Ainge is I wonder if Hayward was smart enough to ask for a no trade clause.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Hayward wouldn't qualify for a no trade clause. I think it's only 10 yrs in league, 5 with same team that can negotiate one.
 
Hayward wouldn't qualify for a no trade clause. I think it's only 10 yrs in league, 5 with same team that can negotiate one.
Close. According to here it's "NBA players are only eligible for an outright no-trade clause in their contracts after spending eight seasons in the league -- at least four with the same team -- and only when the clause is specifically negotiated into a new deal as opposed to an extension to a previous contract"
http://www.espn.com/blog/marc-stein/post/_/id/4937/the-2016-17-nba-all-no-trade-team
 
The way Ainge is I wonder if Hayward was smart enough to ask for a no trade clause.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

I don't think he was eligible for one or he would have asked.
 
Close. According to here it's "NBA players are only eligible for an outright no-trade clause in their contracts after spending eight seasons in the league -- at least four with the same team -- and only when the clause is specifically negotiated into a new deal as opposed to an extension to a previous contract"
http://www.espn.com/blog/marc-stein/post/_/id/4937/the-2016-17-nba-all-no-trade-team

So 10-5 was in the previous CBA or I'm thinking something baseball related.
 
A couple of thoughts:
-no free agent should be able to have a no trade clause in their new contract unless they're signing with a team that has their bird rights
-if the Jazz and Celtics end up with the same record despite the fact incredible disparity in conference quality, then the Jazz wouldn't just be a little bit better, and the Celtics would and should come under fire.
 
Back
Top