Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
Bring on the trolls, bring your best excuses. lets evaluate what just took place in that game, I'm here
no way, did you see how many times the Jazz got blocked tonight?? thats acceptable to you? your standard must be ****ty huh? not me.
this was a lackluster effort vs a team, in a venue where they obviously needed to be on high-alert.
This is no playoff team, their so easy to gameplan against, this is just some sort of learning experience/trade showcase disguised to keep the fans intrigued.. I smell ********, been calliing it since the summer -- they didn't fool me then, their certainly not fooling me now.
Did you see how the Warriors were fronting faovrs, and how thye knew Burks was driving? I know what I'm looking at, their asking too much of these players, on purpose, it's a prep year...
I think the coaches were involved, they wanted to go after Bogut which is unnecessary, Hayward and Favors both got blocked early-on trying it.
Burks should start at PG, Burke at SG and he should only probe/dribble and kick out when he needs to closeout vs a defender flying at him at the 3pt line. the way it's all setup now sorta works, but it's not the best for all parties involved --- The whole rotation and Neto starting thing is moot if he's going to ruin 2v1 fastbreaks bringing the ball up to his shoulder to telegraph a bounce-pass, and then catching the ball while he's standing out of bounds.
The Jazz had butter fingers, and nervous eyes, and poor anticipation -- bunch of bad ****.
Their headed towards the lottery. I've had my fill of Jazz basketball. I quit.
Quit post #284
Bring on the trolls, bring your best excuses. lets evaluate what just took place in that game, I'm here
If our team was comprised of Hayward plus 14 other players homeytennis selected for the team, then yes, I would agree. However, we have one of the best young power forwards in the league and he is nearly unstoppable in the post. We don't have to be reliant on Hayward. That's the point. We could be so much better if our offense revolved around Favors.We are back to the point where the offensive is completely reliant on Hayward
How hypocritical is this statement? It's important that other players on the team become consistent (which I agree with) but isn't it also important for our star/leader/all-star to also be consistent? Why isn't Hayward called out for not making his teammates better? Isn't that what "stars" are supposed to do?If Hayward isn't perfect, the Jazz suffer because Burks (or Hood) hasn't turned the corner and become a consistent player who can make his teammates better.
If our team was comprised of Hayward plus 14 other players homeytennis selected for the team, then yes, I would agree. However, we have one of the best young power forwards in the league and he is nearly unstoppable in the post. We don't have to be reliant on Hayward. That's the point. We could be so much better if our offense revolved around Favors.
How hypocritical is this statement? It's important that other players on the team become consistent (which I agree with) but isn't it also important for our star/leader/all-star to also be consistent? Why isn't Hayward called out for not making his teammates better? Isn't that what "stars" are supposed to do?