JD Vance

[fishonjazz]

16K views · 9.8K reactions | JD Vance talks with fellow humans . . . . . . . . . . #reels #funny #comedyvideo #fyp #sketchcomedy #funnyreel #comedy #funnyvids #comedian #funnyreels #comedyskit #comedyreels #comedyreel #funnyvideo #comedians #comedian

JD Vance talks with fellow humans . . . . . . . . . . #reels #funny #comedyvideo #fyp #sketchcomedy #funnyreel #comedy #funnyvids #comedian #funnyreels #comedyskit #comedyreels #comedyreel...

www.facebook.com

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Deleted member 365]

Man that was weird.

I thought it was pretty funny when he is like "im running for vice president" probably expecting her to be impressed or something. Her response? "Ok"

Also kind of a subtle plug for the Biden administration when he asked her how long the place had been around and she said "about 4 years"

So not only did the country not fall apart when Biden won the election but apparently the owner of this donut shop decided it was a good time to start a new business.

Go Vance Go, you ****ing weirdo

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

Hahaha really good point. Sorta undermines the current Trump attack that we’re in a new Great Depression and World War III combined right now

 

[Deleted member 365]

It's like he's never talked to another human being before about anything not centered around himself.

Hello human breeding machine, how much offspring have you successfully birthed? Wow you have a nice sized skull. How long have you worked here for? What are these round baked goods? They sure look scrumptious!

 

[PJF]

 

[LogGrad98]

As the GOP targets Harris’ border wall stance, the details matter

Several Republicans apparently want voters to believe that Kamala Harris now supports investing in a border wall, but that’s not quite right.

www.msnbc.com

Sen. JD Vance, the Republican Party’s vice presidential nominee, mocked the idea this week that Vice President Kamala Harris “wants to build the border wall.” Hours later, GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham appeared on Fox News and told viewers, “Graham: Do you really believe she’s going to build a wall? That’s just bulls---.”

As for what prompted the partisan pushback, it apparently stems from a report Axios published. The headline read, “Harris flip-flops on building the border wall,” and the article began:

If she’s elected president, Kamala Harris pledges to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border — a project she once opposed and called “un-American” during the Trump administration. It’s the latest example of Harris flip-flopping....

A typical person reading this might believe that the Democratic presidential hopeful recently endorsed investing in a border wall, but that’s not quite what happened.


Let’s take a brief stroll down memory lane.

Democrats, left with little choice, agreed to pay the GOP’s ransom and endorsed a conservative, bipartisan compromise. At that point, Republicans killed the compromise plan they’d demanded — largely because Donald Trump told them to.

What does this have to do with allegations of Harris “flip-flopping”? The bipartisan compromise, which featured concessions from both parties, included some wall funding in the hopes of generating GOP support. It was a relatively modest sum — $650 million, roughly 3% of what the Trump administration sought in 2018 — and the funding wasn’t even new. (As Team Harris reminded Axios, the provision “just extended the timeline to spend funds that had been appropriated during Trump’s last year as president.”)


The vice president has never been a wall advocate — in fact, she’s been a fierce critic of Trump’s plan — but she endorsed the Senate agreement in the hopes of getting something done on the issue.

Six months after Republicans killed the deal they requested, using Harris' convention speech as a news hook, Axios summarized this in bullet-point form, at which point the right effectively declared, “A ha!”

As lines of attack go, this is weak tea. If the Democratic nominee were to actually endorse the merits of a border wall, that would be a dramatic reversal worthy of attention. But her willingness to back a bipartisan compromise — which included provisions she and her party would not support on their own — does not a “flip-flop” make.

 

[fishonjazz]

As the GOP targets Harris’ border wall stance, the details matter

Several Republicans apparently want voters to believe that Kamala Harris now supports investing in a border wall, but that’s not quite right.

www.msnbc.com

I think @Elizah Huge should probably read this as I think he is confused about the topic.

I guess since trump killed the bipartisan border legislation proposal a few months back then he is against the border wall now and is also a flip flopper since that legislation included funding for the border wall.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[fishonjazz]

And this another fabrication being made about the Harris waltz tandem.

Republicans want voters to think Walz lied about his dog. False GOP claims could cause real damage

Republicans turned Tim Walz’s outing at a dog park nearly three years ago into an attack on the Democratic vice presidential nominee this week, working on a false online narrative to paint Walz as a liar. The intended takeaway was that Walz somehow lied about the identity of his dog, Scout, by...

www.yahoo.com

The intended takeaway was that Walz somehow lied about the identity of his dog, Scout, by describing two different dogs as his beloved pet in separate X posts. Social media users shared screenshots of the posts as alleged proof that the Minnesota governor exhibits a pattern of deceit, garnering thousands of likes, shares and reactions across platforms.

In one post, from June 2022, Walz is pictured hugging a black dog. The caption reads, “Sending a special birthday shoutout to our favorite pup, Scout.” The other, posted in October 2022, showed Walz beside a brown and white dog with the caption: “Couldn’t think of a better way to spend a beautiful fall day than at the dog park. I know Scout enjoyed it.”

In response, Walz supporters shared posts on social media showing that Walz was simply playing with someone else's dog while mentioning Scout in the caption.

So, @Elizah Huge, if you read something about Walz lying about his dog just know it's not true. Just more false info like the info you got about about Harris being pro border wall.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Just more false info like the info you got about about Harris being pro border wall.

Is that false? She made a point of including support for it in a speech. I'm aware of the MSNBC article trying to spin it as support for a defunct piece of legislation but I've not heard anything from the candidate to clarify Kamala's actual position. Maybe a reporter should ask her except that Kamala doesn't answer questions from anyone about anything so you have no idea if the info is false or not.

 

[fishonjazz]

Tim Walz once told someone "bless you" after they sneezed. At no time has Walz ever been an ordained minister or had to power to confer blessings.

Comer and Gym Jordan are setting the wheels in motion to aggressively investigate this as they once again do a majestic swan dive into the duties which the American people solemnly hired them to discharge.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Elizah Huge]

@fishonjazz is this article just made up then?

https://t.co/B9GccEX2P3

 

[fishonjazz]

@fishonjazz is this article just made up then?

https://t.co/B9GccEX2P3

It's misleading. If she is elected then she pledges to get the bipartisan border legislation that trump killed passed. Included in that bipartisan border deal is 650 million dollars (trump wanted 18 billion) for the border wall along with a bunch of other stuff.

So if that means she is pro border wall then the fact that trump killed that legislation, and the 650 million dollars, means that he is against the border wall. (Pretty silly statement to make don't ya think?)

Now if you can show me where Harris said that she fought so hard to get money for the border wall included in the legislation because that was such an important part of the legislation then cool. But what actually happened is that Republicans wanted that border wall money in the legislation and Democrats wanted the legislation to pass so they included that border wall money in order to get Republicans to sign off on it. (This is called compromise) Which they did. Until trump told them not to.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Sardines]

@fishonjazz is this article just made up then?

https://t.co/B9GccEX2P3

Holy ****.

She said she supported the bipartisan bill? The one that Trump killed from the sidelines like a bad parent with a kid in flag football running onto the field to tackle a 5 year old so that their child doesn't get embarrassed.

Is that what we're talking about here?

I thought she actually said in her own words that she was going to build a boarder wall.

What I didn't think seeing all this was that she said she supported a now dead piece of legislation that Trump had executed.

Were you actively trying to be dishonest and misleading, or were you simply fooled by others who were being dishonest and misleading?