TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
Philly could and probably would go over the tax to keep Butler, Harris, and Simmons. Not even sure why this is a question.
I was talking about when we aquired boozer. He was a nobody.
It won't shut them up though. They'll just say it's a one time deal, Blah blah blah.I hope one of these big name people sign just to finally shut these “it’s utah, no one comes here” comments the hell up.
Yeah, yeah. I know. But damn lol
Because they also need to worry about Embiid. They signing 4 max contracts? That's an expensive team.Philly could and probably would go over the tax to keep Butler, Harris, and Simmons. Not even sure why this is a question.
Because they also need to worry about Embiid. They signing 4 max contracts? That's an expensive team.
Philly could and probably would go over the tax to keep Butler, Harris, and Simmons. Not even sure why this is a question.
Might be an easy decision for the sixers but is it an easy decision for harris?
After the trade to philly harris shot attempts went down, field goal percentage went down, 3 point percentage went way down (43.4 to 32.6) number of free throw attempts went down, free throw percentage went down, rebounds remained about the same as did assists, points per game went down.
Hopefully he will want to leave
Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
Bear in mind that if Tobias bets on himself by seeking a 3 + 1, Philly's advantage evaporates. Hell, they're probably working at a disadvantage because it wouldn't make sense for him to take a 3 + 1 on a team of ball-dominant assholes that care as much about talking **** as taking their craft seriously.
Philly could and probably would go over the tax to keep Butler, Harris, and Simmons. Not even sure why this is a question.
Not to speak for fish, but Boozer signed with the Jazz in 2004 so anything after that is irrelevant when comparing how large of a free agent signing it is.