What's new

Joe Rogan's Podcast


NAOS

Well-Known Member
What’s more rewarding:

(a) slamming your head against a brick wall
(b) individually tweezing all of your pubes
(c) attempting rational discourse with Archie

?
 


One Brow

Well-Known Member
You randomly, without any context, said I was easily impressed after posting the Schulz video. I'll I saw was "..." with no context.
Right, that was in post #165. Then, you asked me to explain in #169, I responded with a couple of paragraphs in #170, taken from an article that I also linked to, and then in #172 you started going off on some tangent about politics.

Next thing I know, you're lumping me in with the "alt-right."
Except, as I explained in #174, I was not.

OB, I love you my man, but stop this nonsense and assumptions. I'm vaccinated and have encouraged my own family to get vaccinated.
Perhaps if you could stop arguing against months-old posts, and discuss what I actually posted, we could have a conversation.

Just because I posted Joe Rogan ******** on CNN's credibility, does not equate to me being alt-right.
Just because Joe Rogan badgered Gupta and blustered does not make him correct.
 

Archie Moses

Well-Known Member
1) The two paragraphs of the article I quoted did not mention political affiliation.
2) When you asked me why I quoted the article, I gave you a reason that had nothing to do with politics.
3) I have already explicitly denied this once regarding Schultz.

So, I will say this again. No.

At this point, though, you should be asking why you keep coming back to this. Are you trying to avoid my point?


Odd, coming from someone who is posting responses from something he has not understood.


????? Were you trying to make some sort of point there? You failed.
I'm so confused. Did I post the article?
 

Archie Moses

Well-Known Member
Did someone say you had?

So, going back to the reason for this conversation, what do you now think I meant about being easily impressed? Would you like it explained in more detail?
No, it's you that is drawing those conclusions and assumptions. Ask yourself why you do that. Be humble and be capable of being left or right.

Your piss poor assessments tell more about you than me. 100%

I love Rogan and Schulz. That does not equate to me being alt right. It shows how bias you are though.
 

One Brow

Well-Known Member
No, it's you that is drawing those conclusions and assumptions. Ask yourself why you do that. Be humble and be capable of being left or right.
Your being easily impressed by machismo posturing has nothing to do with your being right or left.

Your piss poor assessments tell more about you than me. 100%
Argumentation of all sorts, piss-poor or otherwise, usually say more about the person making the argument. That's kind of a given.

Your assessment of macho posturing by Rogan and Schulz as being effective argumentation says volumes about you. I'm saying very little beyond that; I'm just pointing out what you are saying about yourself.

I love Rogan and Schulz. That does not equate to me being alt right.
So far, you are the only person in this discussion tying this to being alt-right.

It shows how bias you are though.
I'm so biased that I keep losing arguments I'm not making? I can live with that.

So, figured out my point yet? Or, are you going to harp more on political points I have not made?
 

Archie Moses

Well-Known Member
Macho posturing is a cute, new buzz phrase.

I wish OB could tell that to Schultz at one of his shows. You know, because he's a comedian.

Macho posturing?!

He's for real too.
 


Top