I did. It had nothing to do with what I said. If you asked him for another source of Jordan Walker saying that stuff then you were asking for the impossible.
Wait a second game, let’s talk about this rationally:
4. And I’m the one being absurd here? I’m asking for more reliable information that Pfizer is willingly doing harm for profit than a doctored up video from PV. That’s not asking to prove a negative. That’s actually asking one to provide evidence to support the claim Steak has made multiple times.
www.themainewire.com
I do t know who the guy is. Maybe he is exactly who he said he was. But, whoever he is, shouldn’t we at least post the follow up video? I do suspect the whole thing will be seen as more BS by Project Veritas, in the long run. JMO. It’s also nobody’s responsibility in this forum to prove or disprove whether he is who he identified himself to be. As to the why Pfizer does not simply deny his claimed title, no forum member is required to answer that question at all, since any answer could only be speculation. We cannot have the answer with any certainty at all. Why the hell are we responsible for answering for Pfizer? And why can we not point out the questionable reputation of Project Vetitas, without being accused of conspiracism? If Project Veritas is involved, their reputation is relevant, regardless of the veracity of the claims made. And pointing their reputation out is not the equivalent of 100% disproving the interviewed man’s claims.
Pfizer Director of Research Freaks Out After Spilling Virus Secrets in 2nd Project Veritas Undercover Video - The Maine Wire
Undercover video released by Project Veritas on Wednesday showed a high-level employee at pharmaceutical giant Pfizer spilling company secrets. Now, a second video shows how that employee reacted when Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe confronted him about the content of the secret recording. In the...
View: https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1618737936920633344
Well, duh. Any time you take a medicine with an effect, there are possible, unknown side effects. Until you find actual side effects, you're just scare-mongering, and highly ineffectively.
When people say you treat all conservative posters the same and that it is unfair, this is a good example of what we are talking about. I don't think anyone has a problem with you criticizing @SteakNEggs in this thread.
What does Pfizer have to gain by responding to Project Veritas?
It's not PV they are failing to respond to, it's the multiple new main stream news sources asking about it. Here's Reds article stating the same. If he was not an employee they would say so to nip this all in the bud, but they simply can't. You really think this negative publicity is good for the company? They gain a lot actually. They could stop this entire story but they simply can't.
