What's new

John Stockton Claims He Had Proof of 1000 Athletes Dying of Vaccine

You responding to someone suggesting you take a break by angrily barking at them was pretty entertaining to be honest.
"For asking people to provide simple evidence of what they claim? I'll break soon enough as it's clear nobody can answer. As I have continually said, if the guy was fake and didn't even exist then Pfizer would've addressed that when they claimed they weren't mutating viruses while claiming they are "engineering" viruses in the same sentence."

Where's the anger exaclty? There is none. Another fabrication and means to escape that you can't explain yourself. I said nothing in anger, I am simply pushing you guys to back up your claim that Walker is a fake photoshopped, CGI man(again being facetious mocking the hilarity of such claim that he's fake despite no evidence that's been presented (that's why I asked)).
 
Last edited:
"For asking people to provide simple evidence of what they claim? I'll break soon enough as it's clear nobody can answer. As I have continually said, if the guy was fake and didn't even exist then Pfizer would've addressed that when they claimed they weren't mutating viruses while claiming they are "engineering" viruses in the same sentence."

Where's the anger exaclty? There is none. Another fabrication and means to escape that you can't explain yourself. I said nothing in anger, I am simply pushing you guys to back up your claim that Walker is a fake photoshopped, CGI man(again being facetious mocking the hilarity of such claim that he's fake despite no evidence that's been presented (that's why I asked)).
He suggested you take a break. You responded "For asking people to provide evidence for what they claim?"

As if taking a break was a punishment for asking people bad questions and your best defense is to prove that you're asking good questions. Do you not see how ridiculous that is? Fishonjazz isn't your mother and he wasn't threatening you with a timeout.
 
I don't but I think it's pretty shady that Pfizer made billions off of others suffering.
That's the fundamental basis of labor within capitalism. If you mean consumers, Pfizer has prevented millions of hours of suffering and saved thousands of lives.

In most sane worlds that would be frowned upon but you guys have to go to any lengths to protect Pfizer so you do not get exposed.
Pfizer doesn't need my protection. To Pfizer, we are insignificant ants, and you are no more a threat to Pfizer than dog poop on my lawn.
 
Of course you won't answer a simple question and explain how it's fake or provide a single shred of evidence that actual video evidene is somehow fake.
How would we know how Project Veritas faked this video? They have done so many fakes from so many different angles, it's impossible to choose just one.
 
Professor Richard Ebright,

I’ve tangled with Ebright on Twitter before over lab leak conspiracy theories about SARs-CoV-2, and he’s a total conspiracy theorist.

Out of one nutjob's mouth, into your ears.
 
There is literally this guy on camera admitting that the vaccine can be dangerous. That is pretty sufficient evidence unlike an opinion piece.
But that is very, very far from anything resembling “pretty sufficient evidence”. I don’t understand how you can say that, without knowing much more about the guy who’s spilling the beans. I mean, if he were saying this in a court, he be cross examined about his claims. Look, maybe everything he said before he tried to take it back is true, but you have a notion of what constitutes “sufficient evidence” that, at the least, doesn’t work for me.
 
But that is very, very far from anything resembling “pretty sufficient evidence”. I don’t understand how you can say that, without knowing much more about the guy who’s spilling the beans. I mean, if he were saying this in a court, he be cross examined about his claims. Look, maybe everything he said before he tried to take it back is true, but you have a notion of what constitutes “sufficient evidence” that, at the least, doesn’t work for me.
And you fail to even the entertain the idea that it is true. Pfizer has not denied that this guy works there nor that he's a higher up official. What you guys are saying seems fabricated and has literally zero evidence and when I simply ask for evidence you all fail to provide anything, literally anything....even you said "don't answer that".

Now I've brought video evidence, I've brought evidence that it has in fact messed with woman's reproductive cyckes, I've brought evidence that they are actually mutating the virus(in their own words "engineering", I've provided a guy that literally works for Pfizer saying some pretty damning stuff.

You guys, with literally no counter argument claim he's fake. Where are you guys getting this information? How exactly is it fake? With all this pressure on Pfizer why not come out and say he's not an employee? That would literally put the entire PV piece to shame. I've even provided left leaning sources that say they as well as many others have reached out about this....

I have evidence... I have provided evidence... You guys have provided nothing. What if this IS real? A very high up official admitting his own vaccine could lead to dangerous side effects? Admitting that Pfizer buys off government officials (pharma is the leading donor to politicians), admitting gain if function?

You guys fail to even entertain the idea yet you have nothing but bias to say video evidence is wrong. You say my plentiful evidence is insufficient yet you haven't broughten anything to the table. And by you I mean all of you. Your only argument is that PV is not reliable but there's actual video evidence. Unless you can prove that this Jordan Walker is some fake cgi'd face swap fake person you have absolutely nothing.

If he's real, which everything I see is that he is, the claims he is making is extremely important. Maybe not to those who pushed and bullied this vaccine on innocent people (truly one of biggest infringements on human rights in our lifetime) but for those of us who were hesitant for the very reasons Jordan Walker said are partially vindicated. Meanwhile fascist pigs like Thriller can be seen as the bag of bigoted dung that he/they are. This is why he and others are fighting so hard with a conspiracy they cannot backup.

I've asked basic simple questions.
 
Last edited:
Mutation happens during reproduction. Engineering involves the direct insertion of a planned piece of code.
So gain of function... Either way you look at it. Mutating/engineering to make the virus different or in Walkers own words "more potent".
 
That's the fundamental basis of labor within capitalism. If you mean consumers, Pfizer has prevented millions of hours of suffering and saved thousands of lives.


Pfizer doesn't need my protection. To Pfizer, we are insignificant ants, and you are no more a threat to Pfizer than dog poop on my lawn.
I'm sorry I don't think saving lives by gouging customers is admirable. Hell they are even planning on marking up y'all life saving vaccine 10,000%. This has more to do with pharma lobbying for politicians. Generic drugs are much cheaper but with our politicians who are making a killing, no way.... These companies are corrupt and evil. Life saving drugs... At what cost?

 
But that is very, very far from anything resembling “pretty sufficient evidence”. I don’t understand how you can say that, without knowing much more about the guy who’s spilling the beans. I mean, if he were saying this in a court, he be cross examined about his claims. Look, maybe everything he said before he tried to take it back is true, but you have a notion of what constitutes “sufficient evidence” that, at the least, doesn’t work for me.
This is perhaps the most clear example of being set in ones ways because we have a situation where all the evidence is on one side. The guy said what he said and it has been confirmed that he would be in a position to know. There was also a subsequent official release by Pfizer that corroborated some of the most damning initial statements by the guy in the video clip as they tried to downplay the comments. Meanwhile the naysayers have nothing, zero, zilch in terms of evidence and yet are very clearly still convinced being correct. For some, no amount of evidence would be "sufficient" to change from an opinion already held even if the pre-held opinion was based on nothing other than what was wanted to be true.
 
Back
Top