What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Bucknutz said:

View: https://x.com/holden_culotta/status/1816265988557438992?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ
Click to expand...

RFK, Jr. is a huge crypto advocate. BTC would 50x if the US match to gold. At that point, all the hookers and blow are on me.

Lots of talk that Trump will announce plans for the Treasury to accumulate Bitcoin to back the dollar when he speaks Saturday. That will change the tide of the election, unless Kamala pivots hard. Kamala and Doug have owned BTC since 2014 and are tight with the tech bros crowd. Pretty sure she gets it and will pivot as necessary. The really isn't a partisan issue. More liberals own BTC than conservatives. It's more of a boomers/millennials issue.

Has anyone here read/listened to "The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve"? Blows my mind what our banking industry is built on.
 
Sardines said:
Like her work as the DA for the largest state in the U.S., or her role as senator for the largest state in the U.S.?

Her skillset is classic politician, especially Presidential candidates, resume stuff. Now I know since Trump is what counts as a qualified politician, we no longer care about those classical examples of a Presidential resume. She lacks the bombast, the showmanship, the cachet that currently serves as a primary qualification for POTUS.
Click to expand...

We all have different requirements but this means jackshit to me. Watch her speak and then watch someone with a similar background who too was a lawyer and politician (governor of NJ in this case) in Chris Christie speak. One has brains. One has word salads.

Listen, I voted Biden four years ago and Obama once (would’ve been twice but I was out of state the other time and never did mail in) so this isn’t like I’m some life GOP-tard. But Harris is an absolute joke to politics and this country in a way very different than Trump is.
 
Douchebag K said:
nah that's not accurate. He's always rambled on incoherently
Click to expand...
He often resorts to “stream of consciousness” at his rallies. JMO, but I think he knows that audience are the chumps who will vote for him regardless of what he says, so little speech preparation for people already in his pocket. So, he often goes full-on off the top, resulting in streams of consciousness rants about electric boat motors and sharks. This stems from having no respect for idiots stupid enough to believe in him. Why prepare, he knows he’s an entertainer.
 
Red said:
He often resorts to “stream of consciousness” at his rallies. JMO, but I think he knows that audience are the chumps who will vote for him regardless of what he says, so little speech preparation for people already in his pocket. So, he often goes full-on off the top, resulting in streams of consciousness rants about electric boat motors and sharks. This stems from having no respect for idiots stupid enough to believe in him. Why prepare, he knows he’s an entertainer.
Click to expand...

He’s basically a stand up comedian of sorts
 
This is the only news source I can find making this claim:

nypost.com

Exclusive | Obama doesn’t believe Kamala Harris can beat Trump, which is why he hasn’t endorsed her: sources

“Obama’s very upset because he knows she can’t win,” a Biden family source told The Post.
nypost.com nypost.com

On the other hand….

www.theguardian.com

Running Kamala Harris may actually be a political masterstroke for the Democrats | Steve Phillips

Take a hard look at the data: Harris should be able to quickly consolidate support that was slow to coalesce around Biden
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Kamala Harris will likely be the next president of the United States – and that’s overall good news if you care about democracy, justice and equality. Joe Biden’s decision on Sunday to bow out of the presidential race clears the path for the country to elect its first woman and first woman of color as president.

Even though the electoral fundamentals for this year’s election have always favored the Democrats – despite what numerous misleading polls have been showing (and with most of the news media reacting purely off those polls) – Harris’s selection will largely shore up the weaknesses that were dragging down Biden’s poll numbers.


All of the drama and dissatisfaction over Biden’s June debate performance completely obscured the underlying factors that made it more likely than not that the Democrats, even with Biden as nominee, were in a strong position to win in November. Here are the facts.
 
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Keefe said:
We all have different requirements but this means jackshit to me. Watch her speak and then watch someone with a similar background who too was a lawyer and politician (governor of NJ in this case) in Chris Christie speak. One has brains. One has word salads.

Listen, I voted Biden four years ago and Obama once (would’ve been twice but I was out of state the other time and never did mail in) so this isn’t like I’m some life GOP-tard. But Harris is an absolute joke to politics and this country in a way very different than Trump is.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and I don't give a **** about perceived intelligence, and word salads, (insofar as it doesn't affect their ability to win). I only care about what policies they're looking to enact, and who's interests they represent.
 
TheStormofWar said:
My Brother in Christ, 99% of that article is them being fired up.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah for sure, I didn't mean to say otherwise. It's in the title of the article that they are for the most part excited. Just pointing out that most of the negative is about the lack of public input.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top