What's new
By:

Kanter watch

ElRoach0 said:
We should start a pool on who'll give him a few bucks next year. New York? Philadelphia? Denver or LA?

I bet Kanter would sign in LA.
Click to expand...

Nah no way Philly will pay him. NY - Phil is too smart to have Kanter on his team, he'll never figure out the triangle, LOL... Denver is too cheap.


LA sounds like a team that would over pay to get Kanter.
 
ElRoach0 said:
The sad part here... is he'll be AT BEST the third option on the Thunder behind Westbrook and Durrant. So this trade didn't really help him any.
Click to expand...
What's so sad about that? He wanted traded he got what he wanted. I said all along I think the Jazz screwed him over. He's played above my expectations, but done so without Durrant and Adams being healthy.
 
gregbroncs said:
What's so sad about that? He wanted traded he got what he wanted. I said all along I think the Jazz screwed him over. He's played above my expectations, but done so without Durrant and Adams being healthy.
Click to expand...

I missed that. What made you think we screwed him over?
 
ONE LOVE said:
I missed that. What made you think we screwed him over?
Click to expand...
We traded him to a team that had a deep PF/C rotation and 2 guys that dominate the ball. So far they have yet to play at full strength since he's been there. I wonder how many touches and how much playing time he will get when all of their pieces are back.
.
That said he has played over my expectations since he got there. We'll see when they finally are at full strength what happens.
 
gregbroncs said:
We traded him to a team that had a deep PF/C rotation and 2 guys that dominate the ball. So far they have yet to play at full strength since he's been there. I wonder how many touches and how much playing time he will get when all of their pieces are back.
.
That said he has played over my expectations since he got there. We'll see when they finally are at full strength what happens.
Click to expand...

But don't you think he instigated that by demanding that he starts rather than doing what's best for the team? It was clear Gobert was better than him at the C and Favors is a more rounded player at the PF. He should have realised that and either accepted it, or improve. He instead chose to demand a trade.


I don't think we screwed him over, I think we did the best we could with the time frame given to us.
 
ONE LOVE said:
But don't you think he instigated that by demanding that he starts rather than doing what's best for the team? It was clear Gobert was better than him at the C and Favors is a more rounded player at the PF. He should have realised that and either accepted it, or improve. He instead chose to demand a trade.


I don't think we screwed him over, I think we did the best we could with the time frame given to us.
Click to expand...
Yes. You didn't get that inference from my post? I think the Jazz traded him to a bad fit for him. So far it's worked out for both. Intentionally or not I thought the Jazz sent him to a bad situation. We'll see if I'm right when they are healed.
 
what did we get for Kanter again.oh right nothing. Also no Ibaka tonight. McGary is who we should have got for the Kanter trade, instead we got Mc Donalds happy meal. Ps. thunder won by 20
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top