What's new
By:

Let's all freak out, because

Beantown said:
I can't wait to do this tonight!!!!!!
Click to expand...

couple-sleeping_main.jpg
 
VINYLONE said:
I have this game streaming on firstrowsports. Unless they're mistaken. Please advise.
Click to expand...

firstrow requires an app along with a full toolbar and home page reset now? Yikes.
 
Tonight's experiment reaffirmed:

1. Evans is not a starting caliber PF --even against stretch-4's.
2. Kanter should never come off bench (knew this already).
3. Hayward is our best player (knew this already).
4. Kanter and Hayward are our best offensive players (knew this already).
5. Burks is a 6th man (and does this very well).
6. The scrubs are scrubs --even Machado.
7. Burke is progressing. 3-9 (not counting halfcourt heave) and 5 ASTs is decent. Needs more FTAs.
8. Favors still sucks offensively.
9. Favors should have listened to Malone and picked a go to move.
10. Clark is having a Trey Summer League kind of performance.
11. Hayward can really get to the line like 1st year Burks did.
 
Sexual Favors said:
oh and


12. Richard Jefferson really is a geezer (who needs to rest after just 1 preseason game?).
Click to expand...

Tell me you aren't going to be mad when Corbin "rests" Jefferson on back-to-backs during the season. I would have thought this is exactly what TankKrew would want.
 
Sexual Favors said:
Tonight's experiment reaffirmed:

1. Evans is not a starting caliber PF --even against stretch-4's.
2. Kanter should never come off bench (knew this already).
3. Hayward is our best player (knew this already).
4. Kanter and Hayward are our best offensive players (knew this already).
5. Burks is a 6th man (and does this very well).
6. The scrubs are scrubs --even Machado.
7. Burke is progressing. 3-9 (not counting halfcourt heave) and 5 ASTs is decent. Needs more FTAs.
8. Favors still sucks offensively.
9. Favors should have listened to Malone and picked a go to move.
10. Clark is having a Trey Summer League kind of performance.
11. Hayward can really get to the line like 1st year Burks did.
Click to expand...

I agree with those.
 
franklin said:
Tell me you aren't going to be mad when Corbin "rests" Jefferson on back-to-backs during the season. I would have thought this is exactly what TankKrew would want.
Click to expand...

It was a joke. Don't be so sensitive about comments concerning your Corbin's decisions.

Anyways, I am not a part of the tank lovers. I want our young guys to develop this season, and let the chips fall where they may. This is why I've been critical of anything that could possibly inhibit the development of the young guys. If we get a good draft pick, that's a consolation prize. I would rather have the young guys exceed expectations.

Doublea said:
I'm thinking Corbin wanted to play more of the camp invites so he let Jefferson sit out.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
Sexual Favors said:
It was a joke. Don't be so sensitive about comments concerning your Corbin's decisions.

Anyways, I am not a part of the tank lovers. I want our young guys to develop this season, and let the chips fall where they may. This is why I've been critical of anything that could possibly inhibit the development of the young guys. If we get a good draft pick, that's a consolation prize. I would rather have the young guys exceed expectations.



Agreed.
Click to expand...

that's contradictory, I don't understand. Either you are for the tank or you aren't. Can't have it both ways.
 
franklin said:
that's contradictory, I don't understand. Either you are for the tank or you aren't. Can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...

This is where I parted ways with the board months ago.

You CAN be for building for the future, developing chemistry, gaining experience, and let the chips fall where they may (win or lose), without making losing the goal. I still don't believe that's what the Jazz are doing. But you hacks lack comprehensive thinking/strategy skills and see everything so black and white. "You're either trying to make the playoffs (pause for mouth breath) or tanking."

If we get a high draft pick, it's a bonus and one that was obviously considered, but far from the main or even major goal.

punk *** bishes.
 
Sexual Favors said:
Tonight's experiment reaffirmed:

1. Evans is not a starting caliber PF --even against stretch-4's.
2. Kanter should never come off bench (knew this already).
3. Hayward is our best player (knew this already).
4. Kanter and Hayward are our best offensive players (knew this already).
5. Burks is a 6th man (and does this very well).
6. The scrubs are scrubs --even Machado.
7. Burke is progressing. 3-9 (not counting halfcourt heave) and 5 ASTs is decent. Needs more FTAs.
8. Favors still sucks offensively.
9. Favors should have listened to Malone and picked a go to move.
10. Clark is having a Trey Summer League kind of performance.
11. Hayward can really get to the line like 1st year Burks did.
Click to expand...

All things considered, Favors is disappointing right now...:(
Hopefully he picks it up. I was really hoping for some type of consistency on the post but it's still wild and not synchronized.
On the good side, if Favors ends up sucking big time, we don't have to pay much to keep him back here.
 
PKM said:
This is where I parted ways with the board months ago.

You CAN be for building for the future, developing chemistry, gaining experience, and let the chips fall where they may (win or lose), without making losing the goal. I still don't believe that's what the Jazz are doing. But you hacks lack comprehensive thinking/strategy skills and see everything so black and white. "You're either trying to make the playoffs (pause for mouth breath) or tanking."

If we get a high draft pick, it's a bonus and one that was obviously considered, but far from the main or even major goal.

punk *** bishes.
Click to expand...

Just about to type this. Thank you.
 
PKM said:
This is where I parted ways with the board months ago.

You CAN be for building for the future, developing chemistry, gaining experience, and let the chips fall where they may (win or lose), without making losing the goal. I still don't believe that's what the Jazz are doing. But you hacks lack comprehensive thinking/strategy skills and see everything so black and white. "You're either trying to make the playoffs (pause for mouth breath) or tanking."

If we get a high draft pick, it's a bonus and one that was obviously considered, but far from the main or even major goal.

punk *** bishes.
Click to expand...

LOL

Love it!
 
Weezur said:
All things considered, Favors is disappointing right now...:(
Hopefully he picks it up. I was really hoping for some type of consistency on the post but it's still wild and not synchronized.
On the good side, if Favors ends up sucking big time, we don't have to pay much to keep him back here.
Click to expand...

If Favors sucks offensively someone else will pay him for his defense. Some other organizations seem to be THAT stupid as of late. If he sucks offensively by the trade deadline, I say we part ways and trade him. Who knows, maybe there is a deal coming before opening night, and we don't have to overpay (doubt it).

Seriously though, Gobert could be a beast for us on the defensive end, and maybe a reinvented Beans. If Favors can't shoot, I'm not sure I see him as a plus for this team (unless we could get him for really, really cheap). Favors could net us some draft picks (and therefore even more cap space, which we'll need for Kanter/Hayward/someone else, and in the event we actually land a true star with some of our upcoming picks).
 
Weezur said:
All things considered, Favors is disappointing right now...:(
Hopefully he picks it up. I was really hoping for some type of consistency on the post but it's still wild and not synchronized.
On the good side, if Favors ends up sucking big time, we don't have to pay much to keep him back here.
Click to expand...

But why would we want to if he sucks?
 
Sexual Favors said:
If Favors sucks offensively someone else will pay him for his defense. Some other organizations seem to be THAT stupid as of late. If he sucks offensively by the trade deadline, I say we part ways and trade him. Who knows, maybe there is a deal coming before opening night, and we don't have to overpay (doubt it).

Seriously though, Gobert could be a beast for us on the defensive end, and maybe a reinvented Beans. If Favors can't shoot, I'm not sure I see him as a plus for this team (unless we could get him for really, really cheap). Favors could net us some draft picks (and therefore even more cap space, which we'll need for Kanter/Hayward/someone else, and in the event we actually land a true star with some of our upcoming picks).
Click to expand...

I expect the Lakers to come shopping for Favors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top