What's new

Lockout!!!

Well if the remaining players hold off until the start of the next Euro season I'm sure they could all get jobs playing in some league. You make it sound like they are going to starve. They will survive. These aren't people who are use to being millionaires their whole lives.

I kind of doubt this. I'd bet only half the current NBA players would find jobs at best. The obvious problem is foreign leagues have guys under contract as well which limits opportunity. But the unseen issue is foreign teams have their own players who sell seats. My guess is foreign teams LOVE the idea of adding an NBA player, or even two, but know their fans want to see NBA guys playing with the guys they already know, not taking over the whole league.
 
You can't oversell how disorganized Hunter's side has been — especially last weekend and on Monday, when they never allowed the players to vote, failed to give them enough information and couldn't even wrangle every player rep to Monday's meeting in New York. It took them five solid days to respond to Stern's offer; instead of countering with four or five system tweaks like Stern expected (he would never admit that publicly because it would belie his whole "take it or leave it" stance, but it's true), the players simply shredded it and launched the NBA's "nuclear winter" (Stern's words, and really, his only inspired moment of the past few months). Anyone who commends the players for standing up for themselves should mention that, during those five days — which doubled as the five most essential days in the recent history of the players association — many players couldn't even get in touch with their team reps (much less Hunter or Fisher). Those players were standing up for themselves, all right — they were standing up to make sure they had cell phone reception because nobody was emailing them any updates. What a mess.

4. The Agents
If the players don't trust the owners or Stern, and they're losing trust in Hunter and Fisher, who's left?

You guessed it … it's those shrewd and lovable legal minds who negotiate for players, call them every day, know their kids' names, won them over years ago, spent the last few months quietly undermining Hunter, know how to butter up media members and curry favor, and currently have their clients lathered into an anti-The-Man frenzy. The agents despised the owners' latest proposal — they don't want the middle class compromised in any way, or sign-and-trades, or the luxury tax, because that might curtail player movement (their bread and butter). They would rather lose a season to protect what they have, knowing they have much longer careers and they'll make those commissions back over time as long as they can prevent the NBA's model from changing against them too drastically right now.

Make no mistake: The agents are the single smartest group involved in this lockout. They make absurd commissions working over general managers (usually ex-players) who are almost always unequipped to negotiate with them. You know that saying "laughing all the way to the bank"? That's what the best sports agents do. Trust me, they have done the math. They figured out exactly where this lockout needs to end for them — repeat: for them — and advised the players accordingly. Meanwhile, these players can NEVER get that lost season back from three standpoints: how it affects them financially, how it affects their playing careers, and how it affects their fans (especially the casual ones who hopped on the bandwagon these past two years and will just as quickly hop off). The agents were supposed to be protecting these guys; instead, they protected themselves. Of course …

You know what the real irony is? The owners' last proposal actually made a ton of sense. Read Howard Beck's breakdown of what it would have looked like, potentially, and try to find ONE thing that isn't logical. Contracts should be shorter so fans aren't getting constantly turned off by that relentlessly overpaid mediocrity. The gap between big market teams and small market teams should be smaller. A team like Cleveland should have a more favorable chance to keep its best player. A star like Carmelo shouldn't be able to force a trade and get rewarded with a mammoth extension. The mid-level exception should be tempered — it spawned too many dumb contracts and made it harder for teams to improve. What's wrong with coming up with a smarter model in which the right money goes to the right people? That's a bad thing?

Hunter and Fisher failed to prepare the players, fed their anti-Stern neuroses, never unearthed a decent strategy and misread every conceivable tea leaf. Their goal from Day One should have been, "We have no leverage, we need to get the best deal we can without missing any paychecks." Even last week, they mistook Stern's ultimatum as "take it or leave it" when it was really an "S.O.S." — with his influence eroding, Stern barely had enough owner votes and knew small-market teams (along with Washington and Denver) wouldn't back any other offer unless it pillaged the players.8 Hunter and Fisher thought he was bluffing. They were wrong. Dead wrong. That offer is gone. And it's not coming back.

https://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7250994/business-vs-personal
 
Makes me wonder, will these guys actually get unemployment checks if they apply? Never been on unemployment, but don't they give you like 70% of your income?. I'm not OK paying these guys 100k+ a month because they couldn't budget wisely.

There's a maximum on unemployment (it probably vaires from state to state). I think last time I required it, it was about $1000/month. Even for the lower-rung players, endorsement deals would wipe that out.
 
Good article. Should be required reading for all owners and players. And Kessler needs to go.

....I thought so too, especially the observation that there's definitely racial overtones to this lockout/negotiations that are being overlooked! This is much more than about money, a new system, etc. It involves, as I've pointed out...the "hip hop" culture to a very large degree! With the exception of Michael Jordan, how many of these owners do you think have any "rap" songs in their IPODS??? How many of them do you think embrace the "hip hop" culture? How many do you think are over joyed and happy that the NBA virtually went "hip hop" with the majority of there players covered with tattoo's and there selfish style of basketball? Well, here's what Simmons pointed out in that column!

"That's a recurring theme of this lockout, something Bryant Gumbel broached on Real Sports when he compared the NBA owners to plantation owners, then festered when nobody on the players' side distanced themselves from Gumbel's words (if anything, you could almost feel them silently nodding). A few days later, Wise's column "Negotiations could be hijacked by racial perceptions" publicly nailed many of the points that NBPA insiders had been whispering privately for weeks. Why isn't anyone pointing out that Peter Holt is one of Rick Perry's biggest donors? Why isn't anyone remembering that Donald Sterling battled those racial discrimination housing lawsuits, or that Dan Gilbert skewered LeBron James after The Decision and made him seem like, as Jesse Jackson said later, "a runaway slave?" Why hasn't anyone noticed that 28 of these 29 owners are white, or that everyone in David Stern's inner circle is white except for Stu Jackson? Race overshadowed these negotiations more than anyone wanted to admit. Gumbel recklessly ripped that scab open. The NBPA's lead negotiator, Jeffrey Kessler, reopened it last week by stupidly saying, "Instead of treating the players like partners, they're treating them like plantation workers."1 Goodwin (an African-American) revisited the theme a little more diplomatically on Monday, but still … calling the players "property" is pretty telling.2

Is this what happens when 28 wealthy white guys (plus Michael Jordan, who emerged to everyone's surprise as a leader of the "let's screw the players over as much as we possibly can" side) keep trying to impose their will on a collection of not-nearly-as-wealthy-and-mostly black guys? This was one of Stern's biggest mistakes — believing the league had squashed their race issues decades ago, that his record was impeccable on this front, that he could negotiate one last labor deal without worrying about things like, "The players won't care that nearly everyone on my side for this meeting is white, right?" Stern would disagree — vehemently — with Goodwin's assertion that owners treated players like "property." But Goodwin isn't some low-level flunkie. He has represented superstars like Jason Kidd, Paul Pierce, LeBron James and Dwight Howard over the years. He represents Kevin Durant right now. He has a better feel for these guys than Stern does. And if he truly believes the players feel like "property," that's pretty frightening."

https://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7250994/business-vs-personal
 
The worst thing about this situation is now neither side will approach the other because they don't want to weaken their side's position in court. While I've fully accepted for awhile that we won't have a 2011-2012 season, I'm worried that the following season could be in jeopardy as well.

Honestly, I think Bill Simmons is right that many fans will find other sports to occupy their time and spend their money on. Meanwhile, I'm going to my first NHL game next week.
 
The worst thing about this situation is now neither side will approach the other because they don't want to weaken their side's position in court. While I've fully accepted for awhile that we won't have a 2011-2012 season, I'm worried that the following season could be in jeopardy as well.

Honestly, I think Bill Simmons is right that many fans will find other sports to occupy their time and spend their money on. Meanwhile, I'm going to my first NHL game next week.

I think he is overstating it. I think most fans will just watch College Basketball more, but will switch over as soon as the NBA starts again. They may have trouble with game attendance (especially the teams that were terrible, but they will always have that issue), TV rating will still be good.
 
I won't say there isn't a racial component. But if the owners had made a better effort to land the plane, the white (+ Jordan) owners would have made their black/white/hispanic/asian/jewish/metta world peace slaves plenty happy.

From a purely practical perspective, the owners failed. When you win a negotiation, as they did, you finish it right. The owners already had the players in a hot box in Nam drinking their own urine from a dirty towel. In that scenario, you don't then put a bullet in their head. You let them out. Say nice things to them. Give them a meal. And then you put a bullet in their head.
 
Mark Cuban is a white owner and I don't think he has a problem with the "hip-hop" culture. This is more of an age/generation issue to me.
 
The NBA is 30 different corporations working together to set salary stuctures, only one of which pays player salary directly (the Hornets). Why should these 30 companies be allowed to get together and dictate market salary? It would be against the law, and anti-competitive, if the top 30 banks in the US got together to set wages for tellers and loan officers, yet 30 baskeball coporations get a free pass there.

The fact that the NBA is a single franchise may affect this argument. The NBA should have the right to consider the health of its franchise as a whole and has the right to create rules and regulations (e.g., the draft rules, salary cap rules, scheduling rules, broadcast licenses, etc.), even if the individual teams are run as separate corporations. Creating a standardized pay structure has never been considered anti-trust in the past, and there are ways to make high salaries for superstars punitive to the big-market teams without making those high salaries outright illegal. The luxury tax system is designed to achieve this.

However, one key factor here is that it's not really money alone that motivates star players to head to big markets. It has as much to do with the fame and media coverage those bigger cities can offer, as well as the lifestyle that caters to young, highly-paid, self-infatuated demi-god athletes. Top players want to team up to form super teams, and they want to do so in markets like LA, Chicago, NYC, Miami, etc. They want to create a legacy and establish their fame. They're not satisfied just by being in the league alone, and you never hear about players like Carmello Anthony, Chris Paul and Dwight Howard wanting to team up in cities like Milwaukee or Sacramento. When players can dictate where they want to play and who they want to play with, it shifts the power away from the owners and the league itself, even if small-market teams are willing and able to pony up the same (or better) salaries these players want. Then parity in the league completely falls apart. Keep in mind, Wade, Lebron and even Bosh took LESS money than they could have made in other markets so they could team up in Miami. People thought D.Will was going to leave the Jazz in order to play in a bigger market or play with other top players who weren't willing to come to Utah. It wasn't about whether D.Will was going to get paid.

So what are teams like Phoenix (who lost Amare for nothing), Denver (who lost Carmello Anthony), Toronto (who got nothing in return for Chris Bosh), and Cleveland (who got nothing for Lebron and instead got dissed on national television) supposed to do? How are those teams supposed to compete, and how are they supposed to fill their seats when fans want to see a winning product? I think that as much as smaller market teams want a strong share of BRI, those teams are just as motivated to try to gain some semblance of control over the market for free agents. Why? Because they keep getting screwed by players who want to rule the world. I think this is the gist of the conflict and why the players' association shot down the proposal without letting the rank-and-file players vote.
 
So what are teams like Phoenix (who lost Amare for nothing), Denver (who lost Carmello Anthony), Toronto (who got nothing in return for Chris Bosh), and Cleveland (who got nothing for Lebron and instead got dissed on national television) supposed to do? How are those teams supposed to compete, and how are they supposed to fill their seats when fans want to see a winning product? I think that as much as smaller market teams want a strong share of BRI, those teams are just as motivated to try to gain some semblance of control over the market for free agents. Why? Because they keep getting screwed by players who want to rule the world. I think this is the gist of the conflict and why the superstars, executive "committee", lawyers, and agents shot down the proposal without letting the rank-and-file players vote.
Fixed.

Further credence to the notion that the journeymen aren't involved in the process.

BTW, cool essay, bro (from one who has a tendency to write them :p ...).

The number of non-big-market teams who lost big players is a good point that you mentioned. Phoenix is a relatively big city, but they still had a hard time holding on to Amare, and Denver is a somewhat fun and hip city, too, but not good enough for the Syracuse punk. More understandable that so many owners were pushing for more parity.
 
....I thought so too, especially the observation that there's definitely racial overtones to this lockout/negotiations that are being overlooked! This is much more than about money, a new system, etc. It involves, as I've pointed out...the "hip hop" culture to a very large degree! With the exception of Michael Jordan, how many of these owners do you think have any "rap" songs in their IPODS???...

probably at least one, since Jay Z is co-owner of the Nets...


so Jordan's not even the only black owner either, fwiw
 
Fixed.

Further credence to the notion that the journeymen aren't involved in the process.

BTW, cool essay, bro (from one who has a tendency to write them :p ...).

The number of non-big-market teams who lost big players is a good point that you mentioned. Phoenix is a relatively big city, but they still had a hard time holding on to Amare, and Denver is a somewhat fun and hip city, too, but not good enough for the Syracuse punk. More understandable that so many owners were pushing for more parity.

Carmello was born and raised in NYC. His wife works in NYC. Do you really blame him for wanting to play in NYC?
 
Back
Top