Well if it is observed by Science that 'physical' things cannot create itself (100% proven), then doesn't it follow that we have to look for an 'immaterial' matter/being to be the creator?
Longest Thread Ever
- Thread starter babe
- Start date
What gibberish.
Do you agree 100% of the times a physical material cannot 'create' another physical material? i.e., a rock cannot create another rock, a human cannot create a rock, etc, etc, etc.
This is hilarious. Are you talking about the conservation of energy?
Can you produce a rock with your bare hands?
What is the difference between 'zero' and 'nothing'?
Ok, thanks.
No, really. Is there a difference? Is zero 'nothing'?
When you're saying zero there has to be a context. Zero of what? Nothing is simply a void of anything.
But zero is a representation of nothing. It doesn't need context. Nothing is zero things.
What. is. your. point.
My point is that there isn't a difference between "something" and "nothing" from a fundamental logic perspective. Zero can be made out of things that aren't zero. What you're saying is some observation about how our existence works (can you magically create things out of nothing??).