freakazoid
Well-Known Member
We're talking about the fact that the Ws pick next year(2013) is likely to be in the 10 - 14 range, even with their injury problems, meaning that re-negotiating the protection on that pick isn't likely going to net us anything.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you about taking our chances with getting the #8, but I do think you're missing something here. Suppose we get them to drop the protection to top 3 protected, and they end up having injury problems again, and it looks like they will not be in the playoff race again. Regardless of what people think, they WILL tank again to try and keep their pick, if they're not in the playoff hunt. Obviously they're not likely to be bad enough to finish bottom 3, but the closer they get, the better their odds of jumping into the top 3. That would put Utah in a great position to get a very good pick if they tank and come up short, just like this year, only in the 4-7 range instead.
Some people assume their fan base wouldn't tolerate tanking again, but that just isn't the case. That team has absolutely no trouble selling tickets, and for every fan they have that hates tanking, they have 5 who understand the implications of losing a pick while winning a few meaningless games. The majority of their fans not only supported their tank this year, but they were actually pissed that their FO made it so close, instead of making absolutely sure they kept their pick.