Yall are underrating Sap's ability to create his own shot. He was crossing his man up in the paint and either driving on them, or stepping back with ease.
But Boozer's presence, either high or low, is a strobe light to Millsap's penlight in this offense.
Or, rather, as the offense versus being in the offense.
casuistry.
This is now an issue of morality and ethics? You REALLY do have a word of the day calendar..... cuuuuuuuuuuuuuute! (smiley face emoticon, smiley face emoticon, smiley face emoticon)
The idea that Millsap could replace Boozer is something that no one who understands skillsets would reasonably conclude.
Word of the day? Don't lower it to your own level.
Obviously you did little other than look up the most base-definition of the word, without understanding the underlying complexities.
That is, within lawyering, to obfuscate. Rather redundant.
And yes, my reply is pedagogic. Yet your post certainly called for it.
As far as psychology, it's humorous how typical you are: so sarcastic and simultaneously proud of your own ignorance. Though, I suppose to miss that point is the point. For you.