The Fresh Prince
Well-Known Member
Hornacek at the end of his career was not better than Houston at age 26-31. Hornacek couldn't create his shot like Allan, nor was he as clutch as Allan, and he couldn't attack the basket as well, nor was he as athletic as Houston. (Btw 1999 Playoffs Houston was hitting clutch basket after clutch basket). The problem with Houston is his unselfish play, he'd take the backseat for Latrell, Grant Hill, but that's exactly what we needed. We needed a guy who'd occasionally go off for 30-40 points like Houston, hit a clutch basket when we needed it. And I'm certain Stockton wouldve set Houston up far better than Sprewell, Ward & Chris Child's were.meh, allan houston wasn't much better than hornacek - if at all. Houston back then was about a 15-18 ppg guy, but his TS% in 97 and 98 was abysmal. low .500s. Jeff Hornacek was about 12-14 ppg but his TS% for back then was pretty elite in the high .500s. there was no contest in terms of efficiency. Houston, i think one could argue was better defensively, but he was no world beater on that end either. Hornacek was the far superior passer/playmaker.
yeah, the more i look at it and think about it, Hornacek was absolutely a better player. the only thing Houston had on Horny was maybe defense, but again, not by much. if we can't choose stars from back then - give me an elite wing defender like Eddie Jones, Ron Harper, Aaron McKie - somebody who could at least make things tough on MJ.
Hornacek, I believe only had one 30 point game 97-retirement.
Last edited:
