The NBA is proposing new lottery rules that levels the odds of getting the top 3 or maybe even the top six picks. I think that hurts the Jazz in their current state. I believe the Jazz are going to be in the bottom five for the next several years. Why would we even consider changing the system until we are a much better team? Even if we improve over last year, and I believe we will, we still play in the Western conference. It is going to be hard to win a lot of games until we get more talent. I hope any lottery changes come several years from now.
Yup agreed. It's probably a stretch to implement it this coming season - just don't think there is enough time for consultation, etc.
I do believe DL is all over this and has therefore constructed the team to tank-1-more-year.
Completely disagree. Will the Jazz make the playoffs? Extremely unlikely. Last season it would have required 49 wins. Jazz are going to be better, but they won't double their win total.
But a tank requires getting rid of decent players and/or having no bench. Jazz have STRENGTHENED their bench. They re-signed Hayward.
PG - Burke no longer a rookie, Exum an immediate upgrade over Garrett/JLIII
SG/SF - Still have Hayward, Burks. Gordon likely to be much improved shooting-wise (can't have another epically bad season). Burks came on late. He starts the season at a higher level than last October. Hood is lottery-value talent.
PF - Kanter may/may not be better. But Booker and Novak are solid backups.
C - Favors will likely be improved. We've already seen Gobert is leaps and bounds better than he was last season.
If the Jazz don't win AT LEAST 35 games, it will be a disaster. Let's say the Jazz win 30. That would have been the 9th worst record last year. Proposed changes shouldn't affect the Jazz at all. I do see why Philadelphia is objecting. I don't agree with their strategy, but I do think the NBA needs to table the change for one season. 76er's are operating under the rules now in effect. Teams are largely set for 2014/15. NBA should not be allowed to make a change until AFTER the next draft.
The jazz were 4th last year. Some teams Intentionally tanked (76ers). If they change the system teams wont tank. The jazz are in the brutal western conference. The teams best player is probably hayward and he is not a number one guy on a championship team. I think the jazz will probably be bottom five. I do love everyone optimism, however. The problem with the proposed system is that if you are bad you could be bad forever. For ev er. For...ev...er. It scares me. I would be a whole lot more comfortable if we had at least one superstar.
Jazz do not need to be a championship team this year. That still leaves open lots of room for improvement. Like a bench that is worlds better than last years bench. Plus the energy froma fresh start with Coach Q.
There are teams that are bad forever now. Orlando, Kings, Wolves, Sixers...
We might be optimists (I have always been with my sports teams) but you seem to be very pessimistic about this.
Couldnt the jazz be a bottom 5 team next year and still win the lottery even under this new proposed system?
I am a pessimist by nature but I'm trying to see the hope others have. We have a new coach and improved bench. We have no superstars and we play in the western conference. Wolves have been better than us the last couple years and will be getting wiggins. Orlando will improve a lot this year. Sixers have a rebuilding plan that at its core involved tanking for 3 years. If the plan comes together they will be much improved in the future. The jazz dont have free agents flock to them. If they suck the only way to improve is via the draft. If the rules change dramatically the jazz may suck and never get better. I still like my idea of a three or four year weighted average with the worst teams getting the highest pick. No ping pong balls.
It is possible. But its also possible to be bad and not win the lottery. Thus you do not improve. I would like a system that ensures the bad teams get the best picks but also discourages tanking. My proposal of a weighted average over several years does this. Most teams will not intentionally tank 3 or 4 years in a row because they will lose fans. Taking a weighted average over time discourages tanking and ensures the bad teams get better players. I've been a fan for too long not to recognize the problem with the proposed changes. What you dont wAnt are teAms like the Lakers and Chicago having their star injured one year lose a whole bunch of games one year. Win the lottery and then dominate for years to come. Change the draft system but I dont like the current proposal.
i figured the NBA would do something about the lottery, but i didnt think the changes would take place until the next CBA. crazy stuff
It is possible. But its also possible to be bad and not win the lottery. Thus you do not improve. I would like a system that ensures the bad teams get the best picks but also discourages tanking. My proposal of a weighted average over several years does this. Most teams will not intentionally tank 3 or 4 years in a row because they will lose fans. Taking a weighted average over time discourages tanking and ensures the bad teams get better players. I've been a fan for too long not to recognize the problem with the proposed changes. What you dont wAnt are teAms like the Lakers and Chicago having their star injured one year lose a whole bunch of games one year. Win the lottery and then dominate for years to come. Change the draft system but I dont like the current proposal.
Increasing the number of spots that are 'randomly selected' only gives the NBA script writers more opportunities to tinker. This rule probably has very little to do with the league bing upset with Philly, and more about the PTB upset that they couldn't manipulate a way to get Exum to the Lakers or some other player-team hook up they wanted to make.
While they are at it, they ought to have a computer 'randomly select' the playoff match ups too. I bet the results would be shocking!
I don't like the weighted system at all. I'd rather have the current system. The weighted system takes too long to get a top pick. You would have to tank/rebuild for 5 years before your get that pick. At least right now, teams can tank 1 yr, then get back to the playoffs.
I don't like the weighted system at all. I'd rather have the current system. The weighted system takes too long to get a top pick. You would have to tank/rebuild for 5 years before your get that pick. At least right now, teams can tank 1 yr, then get back to the playoffs.