Guys, this just in, when bad things happen to the public legislation is always there to make it right!
No reason to care/worry, congress always has our back!
No reason to care/worry, congress always has our back!
Yeah, the path to that is there, right until they go down that path, then the law changes because people aren't cool with being blocked for political or commercial reasons from going to the sites they want to go to. And the second someone tries to go to their favorite echo chamber but gets redirected to the enemy echo chamber it's going to be armed rebellion.
So, instead of doing it right the first time... ?
Am I understanding you?
People are acting like evilcorp is just gonna start controlling our lives as soon as net neutrality ends. I think you're all being silly as ****.Guys, this just in, when bad things happen to the public legislation is always there to make it right!
No reason to care/worry, congress always has our back!
People are acting like evilcorp is just gonna start controlling our lives as soon as net neutrality ends. I think you're all being silly as ****.
lolPeople like you are why individual rights and freedoms have been declining.
I highly highly doubt any of what you're saying comes true. Highly.
I'm sure Comcast will make clear that they will not be blocking content, will not be re-routing users. The second that starts happening legislation will pass to make it illegal to do that. I'm not skurred.
I'm not in favor of eliminating net neutrality. You didn't understand that the first time I said it?
I have...As of right now, it's good. As of the 14th, if nothing changes, it's potentially bad.
If something's going to change, why not do it right so we don't have to continue tweeking it down the line? It's just passing the buck.
Doing nothing to stop what's on the docket will cost every private citizen more; one way or another.
OR
Your minor apathy on the subject is disturbing. I recognize you're not in favor of eliminating neutrality, but that's just not enough. Particularly because it's so easy to voice a concern with available tools.
I am STRONGLY in favor of net neutrality.
I see that it is 99% likely that it's about to end... for now. I think there WILL be negative consequences to it ending. I just think people are being silly with the extent to which it will negatively impact us. Like net neutrality is the difference between liberty and oppression.
Where are you guys when cops are searching peoples' pockets on the street with no warrant and no reasonable suspicion? Where are you guys when police dogs are used at inland boarder patrol checkpoints? Where are you guys when our government executes people? Where are you when extreme mandatory minimum sentences are given out?
Oh wait, your porn might not load as fast if you don't pay a premium.. sorry, let me drop everything and freak out.
Yes, we were bitching about these things when Bush/Obama pulled away these rights too. Too bad their where people like yourself who were like "Oh well, if it gets too bad they will just change the law".I am STRONGLY in favor of net neutrality.
I see that it is 99% likely that it's about to end... for now. I think there WILL be negative consequences to it ending. I just think people are being silly with the extent to which it will negatively impact us. Like net neutrality is the difference between liberty and oppression.
Where are you guys when cops are searching peoples' pockets on the street with no warrant and no reasonable suspicion? Where are you guys when police dogs are used at inland boarder patrol checkpoints? Where are you guys when our government executes people? Where are you when extreme mandatory minimum sentences are given out?
Oh wait, your porn might not load as fast if you don't pay a premium.. sorry, let me drop everything and freak out.
yeah, we needz more laws.Yes, we were bitching about these things when Bush/Obama pulled away these rights too. Too bad their where people like yourself who were like "Oh well, if it gets too bad they will just change the law".
Too bad? I didn't give anyone permission to end net neutrality. You're being silly as ****.Yes, we were bitching about these things when Bush/Obama pulled away these rights too. Too bad their where people like yourself who were like "Oh well, if it gets too bad they will just change the law".
Well yeah, that's the dumb part. Just like how Cy is essentially blaming me for net neutrality ending. It was supposed to be equally as dumb as Cy is being.I sympathize with the "it's not the end of the world" part of your argument. But I'm not a fan of the "children dying in Africa" part.
A large number of messages lambasting the Obama-era regulation began appearing on the FCC's public forum with the same text. While it is not unusual for commenters to use form letters provided by activist groups, people began complaining they hadn't submitted the comments that carried their names and identifying information.
They were being impersonated.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman started to investigate after noticing many of these comments involved people in New York. There was an unexpected roadblock along the way: the FCC declined to cooperate with his office’s investigation, he said, rebuffing requests for logs and other records associated with the comments.
The disclosure the FCC had denied Schneiderman’s request was made in an open letter he wrote to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai this week.
Schneiderman wrote that the FCC's public comment process for the regulation change, which is required by law, “has been corrupted by the fraudulent use of Americans’ identities.”
“Such conduct likely violates state law — yet the FCC has refused multiple requests for crucial evidence in its sole possession that is vital to permit that law enforcement investigation to proceed,” he wrote. “In doing so, the perpetrator or perpetrators attacked what is supposed to be an open public process by attempting to drown out and negate the views of the real people, businesses, and others who honestly commented on this important issue.”
The letter has brought renewed scrutiny to what Schneiderman, as well as other researchers, believe may be hundreds of thousands of fake comments supporting the FCC’s proposed rule change. The accusations have raised questions about the integrity of another public forum, this one run by the federal government, in a moment of growing national concern for the ways in which social media can be exploited for political purposes.
No, I blamed people like you, not just you.Well yeah, that's the dumb part. Just like how Cy is essentially blaming me for net neutrality ending. It was supposed to be equally as dumb as Cy is being.