You know of floods not composed of drops of water? You don't believe in feedback cycles?
New theory on mass extinction in Permian period.
- Thread starter MVP
- Start date
You know of floods not composed of drops of water? You don't believe in feedback cycles?
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
It's ****ing omnipotent God! Not some mortal dude who makes mistakes. These little comparisons probably sound so good in your heads, but you are not describing a perfect being who is all good, all powerful, and created the universe, who is worthy of dedicating your life and praying too.
You can't have it both ways, what you are describing is pretty much just nature at work, why attach God to that at all? I highly doubt you view the God you pray to every night as some psycho who keeps destroying his creation to make another.
Dat app doe.
You can't have it both ways, what you are describing is pretty much just nature at work, why attach God to that at all? I highly doubt you view the God you pray to every night as some psycho who keeps destroying his creation to make another.
Dat app doe.
PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
You make fun of the "creationists" who believe in Noah and the ark and then you say that?
No, but it is not cause for all this brow beating.
Last edited:
You believe CO2 is going to cause a mass extinction?
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
We are changing the environment. The changes we make are creating even more changes. Calling this "brow beating" doesn't alter any of that.
Do you mean, in and of itself? That does not seem to be true. Do you mean, is CO2 an important trigger for a variety of processes, which combined with other changes we make, is currently triggering the start of a mass extinction? I accept the evidence that this is happening.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
90-95% of all life died.
Saying oh don't worry about it we are not yet on track to destroy 95% of life is ricockulous. Google methane plumes. Google arctic tundra methane. **** doesn't need to get apocalyptic for it to suck hard.