What's new
By:

Our Embassy is Under Attack

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
silesian said:
if trump had said we were going to take out a specific cultural target because it was harboring military assets, there would be a different argument to be had. That is not the case.


It mobilized the enemy and alienates the allies.

there is the obvious moral argument against destroying artifacts of human history. Trump looks at the world as America and others. If you look at humanity you see that Iran has important sites for the world, not just Iran.

destroying sites connected to religions are attacks not on Iran but to non Iranians, alienating moderates and energizing extremists.

Immoral acts alienate our Judeo Christian Allies.

it erodes American support for valid and necessary military action in the region.

Committing a war crime undermines our support for the Geneva convention and takes away our ability to condemn war criminals. We lose the high ground

Iran military leaders by responding to trumps threats to attack cultural targets by saying they would attack only military targets. This was strategically brilliant. Makes the world wonder who are the good guys and who are the bad guys.
Click to expand...


Chalk up another of the thousands of episodes revealing Trump as a scourge upon the earth and humanity. Do you think Trump would feel any personal sense of awe or humility if he visited the world's most important cultural sights? Me neither. He has no interest in protecting the human race from climate change, why would he care about our shared history of man?
 
The Thriller said:
Remember how you agreed that we shouldn’t reveal our strategy? Look at what Dear Leader just tweeted:



I know we’ve had our differences, but I think even you and I can both agree that tweeting this out probably isn’t great. This certainly wasn’t the “strategy reveal” or “vision” I was asking for. If we want to set the Arab world on fire (not to mention our allies, by committing war crimes) let’s blow up important cultural and religious sites! Sites that are protected by international law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2441

But I think it’s a clear look inside the mindset of the most simple and transparent president we’ve ever had.
Click to expand...

I'm certainly no expert but this dude says it was a good tweet. I think he has a better background than us both. Don't know.

https://www.tribuneledgernews.com/e...deo_92b6137c-2544-599b-8b26-45debc53303c.html
 
Archie Moses said:
I'm certainly no expert but this dude says it was a good tweet. I think he has a better background than us both. Don't know.

https://www.tribuneledgernews.com/e...deo_92b6137c-2544-599b-8b26-45debc53303c.html
Click to expand...

Taking out Soleimani was too risky. Now they are painted into a corner and so are we. Trump is afraid of what they might do so he went all in. Possibly a smart move but he is playing checkers(not chess) with millions of lives. They are willing to die as martyrs though. Based on Trump's bombastic approach to everything this was a predictable outcome of him as a statesman, as I've been saying since before he was elected.
 
str8line said:
Taking out Soleimani was too risky. Now they are painted into a corner and so are we. Trump is afraid of what they might do so he went all in. Possibly a smart move but he is playing checkers(not chess) with millions of lives. They are willing to die as martyrs though. Based on Trump's bombastic approach to everything this was a predictable outcome of him as a statesman, as I've been saying since before he was elected.
Click to expand...

After seeing everything thats been happening the last few days it appears to have been a mistake to take him out in such a bold way. This is escalating really quickly. Maybe Iran is all talk but they seem to be more than a tad bit upset by all of this.
 
str8line said:
Taking out Soleimani was too risky. Now they are painted into a corner and so are we. Trump is afraid of what they might do so he went all in. Possibly a smart move but he is playing checkers(not chess) with millions of lives. They are willing to die as martyrs though. Based on Trump's bombastic approach to everything this was a predictable outcome of him as a statesman, as I've been saying since before he was elected.
Click to expand...

exactly. Good post.
 
Engorged On Unborn Gore said:
Somebody on Wall Street probably made some money on futures with that info, too.
Click to expand...

exactly what the religious gun tootin rubes in rural Pennsylvania voted for, Amiright??? Donald is Totally stickin it to them elitist Wall Street types who outsourced them jobs! I mean, Hillary was like married to Wall Street. Thank god donald is draining the swamp.

/sarcasm
 
let’s clarify some things here since apparently already, basic facts surrounding 9/11 have been memory holed:

The 9/11 Commission made no mention of him (Solemnai) And Iran’s involvement with 9/11 planning was zero. Here are what some expert reporters and news agencies have said:









I think it’s safe to say that Pence’s tweet was a lie and this claim that Iran was involved in the planning or execution of Al-Qaeda’s 9/11 attacks is easily debunked. This admin lies about its inauguration size, where hurricanes hit, who was responsible for the 2016 election attack, and who was responsible for 9/11. So let’s stop giving this nonsense any legitimacy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Zombie said:
Jesus christ lol. A week ago no one in this country knew who this guy was and now that we've killed him he's literally Hitler.

Get a grip.
Click to expand...

Obviously a pos, but was he worth escalating this into whatever the F this is now? Seems likely no.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top