What's new

Pissing Match

Well, you were technically lying since the old cuts expired and the republicans agreed on new rates than were higher than the old rates, but lower than the old old rates. Get it? We don't need to be honest with each other around here, Stoked. Just technical.

Damnit, my bad.
 
The funny part is that the sequestration was crafted by the White House and signed off on by Obama.
 
So your contention is that Boehner was lying the many times he said this is what what he wanted, and Obama was lying the many times he said he was forced into this to prevent the nation defaulting on its obligations?

Not at all. Simply that sequestration was the White's House's idea.
 
Not at all. Simply that sequestration was the White's House's idea.

Do you have some evidence of this other than Woodward saying it? Like, someone from the white house saying it, maybe?

I already posted a video of Boehner saying it was what he wanted. That should pretty much end any debate about it. That is, unless you have a video of Obama saying it's what he wanted
 
Do you have some evidence of this other than Woodward saying it? Like, someone from the white house saying it, maybe?

I already posted a video of Boehner saying it was what he wanted. That should pretty much end any debate about it. That is, unless you have a video of Obama saying it's what he wanted

Woodward said it and the Washington Post investigated it and found Woodward to be factual. If you choose to ignore this information, fine. I have no way of changing your mind otherwise.
 
The funny part is that the sequestration was crafted by the White House and signed off on by Obama.

And the funnier part is the republicans are being blamed for it.

By the way, Woodward's claim is ******** - Politico posted the entire e-mail exchange that he was referring to and no where was he threatened in it.

https://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/exclusive-the-woodward-sperling-emails-revealed-88226.html

Your original link either lied about it or (conveniently) didn't have all the facts.
 
And the funnier part is the republicans are being blamed for it.

By the way, Woodward's claim is ******** - Politico posted the entire e-mail exchange that he was referring to and no where was he threatened in it.

https://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/exclusive-the-woodward-sperling-emails-revealed-88226.html

Your original link either lied about it or (conveniently) didn't have all the facts.

Which claim? That Obama is moving the goalposts as woodward put it or that he was threatened. I believe Woodward thought he was being threatened but I do not believe that was what the aide was doing.
 
Woodward said it and the Washington Post investigated it and found Woodward to be factual. If you choose to ignore this information, fine. I have no way of changing your mind otherwise.

I haven't seen anyone say it was Obama's idea except for Woodward (besides the many outlets that reference Woodward as the basis for their own claim). I haven't seen any proof that Woodward is correct.

I have seen plenty of people with direct knowledge of this (Obama, Pelosi, Reed) claim that it was not what Obama wanted. I've also seen Boehner himself say that it was what he wanted (as he says in the video I posted).

To be, there is no debate about it. And unless I see some evidence to the contrary, I will consider Woodward to be full of it.

If this isn't what Boehner wanted, his house would put forth a bill to stop it.
 
Back
Top