So are we giving credit to past or present President for the current economy?
That was a graph of the stock market. Try again.
So are we giving credit to past or present President for the current economy?
If you mean that, as a percentage of the population or as a part of government policy, white nationalism has not increased this century and is far lower than even 50 years ago, I agree. However, compared to just 10-15 years ago, white nationalism has become more acceptable as a public position, due in no small part to a reaction to Obama and the current POTUS.
That was a graph of the stock market. Try again.
A cogent argument could be made for 3, 7, 10, and 14 as well.Well, going by here, 5, 12, 13, 17, 19, and 23 qualify.
Yep. All facts matter. https://www.weeklystandard.com/jeffrey-h-anderson/obamas-historically-bad-economy
I own that I misspoke about the 2% thing. Did things start improving at the very end of 8 years? Sure they did. About freaking time.
My whole point, especially since this thread is about race, was that Obama did less than I expected to improve the lives of the impoverished especially minorities. Can anybody point to any legislation he pushed or signed off on which was designated to improve the lives of those in poverty hell? Like I said before, Trump is an *** but his tax cuts have seemed to have a positive impact for minorities. Some will say that more women, African Americans, etc. need to be in power to work on behalf of the groups they represent. That logic isn't proven. As long as our policies are fair and designed to improve all lives, it shouldn't matter the race, gender, orientation, whatever of the person is who implements the policies. That's why I'm sick and tired of labels. We spend way too much time as a society labeling people.
Is the stock market not part of the economy?
Does it not, for the most part, correlate to how to the economy is doing?
For example: the housing market crashed, people lost their jobs, AND the stock market crashed?
I think the opposite but it's a difficult discussion to have in the US without nailing down an exact definition to agree upon. Here, nationalism or culturalism is rooted in white nationalism from colonization. Still, I'm hesitant to lump those wanting to preserve their culture, national identity/ideology in with white nationalists seeking to preserve a white power structure. Even if I did, I see that mentality in decline, dying off.
What about the big percentage of whites who didn't own slaves or hate blacks? There were plenty that fought against it making the US a staple in abolishing slavery.Generally, I agree with you, except that I'm not sure how you can separate out "preserve their culture, national identity/ideology" from "preserve a white power structure". I mean, it's not like St. Patrick's Day (as an example) or ballroom dancing is under attack. I'm not sure what white people feel they need to preserve that is not a part of the white power structure.
Generally, I agree with you, except that I'm not sure how you can separate out "preserve their culture, national identity/ideology" from "preserve a white power structure". I mean, it's not like St. Patrick's Day (as an example) or ballroom dancing is under attack. I'm not sure what white people feel they need to preserve that is not a part of the white power structure.
It’s not just that you got the basic facts wrong. By wildly exaggerating the stock market trump boost (pretty easy to see that it just continued increasing at about the same rate) and the gdp numbers (are 2017 and 2018 statistically different from the previous 8 years?), your credibility is shot. Trumps economic record is good, so why all the MAGA hyperbole?
Also, @LoPo Trump doesnt deserve credit for jack squat.