Protestors storm capital
- Thread starter LogGrad98
- Start date
I didn't, and unlike you, I provided evidence for my position which used all the relevant material.
No. Frankly, it's pretty funny you think it could be otherwise. Who would pay someone to lie on JazzFanz? What an enormous waste of money that would be.
Hax0rs
Banned
Please tell me where I did the bolded? That's lie number 1
I provided a link that says Officer Sitnik died of natural causes, no other capitol police officers died. That's lie number 2
Is this how marxist/communist traitors to their country talk?
This kind of comment is not helpful to your cause.
Most Americans are skeptical about the event as portrayed in the media, and especially of political haymaking on it. Trumps' supporters were never trained or instructed in any way for "political agitation", and no one except the marginal yayhoos, including groups possibly organized by well-trained Marxist false flag activists, brought anything to the demonstration/rally. No one talked of doing anything unlawful.
I think the FBI has pursued all those people who in any way participated. The warranted charges, stretched as far as the evidence can imply, are out of line with an assessment that resembles your remark above.
Tactics like this just look shamefully overworked to most people.. People hoot at the "news" nowadays, and ignore almost everything that's written to hype up the issue.
The ONLY reasonable explanation for this is the decision by Pelosi and McConnell to deny repeated requests, on reports of possible violence, for enhanced security, and the refusal of Trump's own offer to get more help for law enforcement there at that time, is that they had no intent to stop anything.
That can ONLY mean Pelosi WANTED some event. McConnel too. Yes, they said they didn't want "attention" or whatever from having too much security, but that's a pretty silly reason to be simply irresponsible. It's public property, ya know. Even "sacred" public property in hindsight. That is sacred ground Pelosi decided to leave exposed to potential violence. Easy to see her lie in this.
It just didn't really work out very good for Pelosi. Despite people sent to the Trump rally to try to incite violence, hardly anyone bit on the bait. That means the media and the RINO/DINOs had to exaggerate a lot.
So, the evidence says it was Pelosi who endangered the capitol police and threw them under the bus for her elegant display of a contrived "insurrection".
Hax0rs
Banned
Exactly, and you better believe this "Investigation" they desire, would be more of a "Clean-Up" than anything else.
How do you have all the video coming out instantly of people in Trump clothing breaking windows/rushing in. Instant media frenzy, iNsUrReCtIoNiStS! They killed an officer, maybe multiple. Multiple police injured. A police officer runs away up stairs as unarmed men chase him down...Its a damn clown world
Months later you have other videos of police letting people in. Liberals still up in arms about some supposed insurrection when these videos are out there of people being let in by police. They mockingbirded the **** out of these delusional people, its all right in front of their eyes....
but Orange Man Bad....
Red
Well-Known Member
Well, granted there is also such a thing as a “tyranny of the majority”. As for “you Marxists”, well not me personally I feel obliged to say, and Trump was very much authoritarian, but was clearly not a globalist. As for nationalism, well, it’s true I prefer to think of myself as a citizen of Earth, first, and I do hope we get our act together as a species some day. If that involves nations acting in concert to confront common problems besetting the only planet we have, well that would be nice. We are very immature, I hope we grow up some day, I’m sure the Earth and life on Earth would appreciate that trend, if the Earth and Life had a voice. Nationalism in general has inspired/triggered more wars than cooperative efforts at dealing with global problems. Not a fan of that form of uber-nationalism.
When you implied they agreed with the actions of the rioters.
Sorry, that's my honest evaluation. I could certainly be wrong. If you cared to show why, though, you would actually have to address what I'm saying rather than attack me.
Which I followed up with a link where that same coroner said the events of the riot played a part in his death. Your own source does not agree with your position. Does that trouble you at all?
Ignoring evidence does not make it disappear, it just makes you seem unable to deal with it or process it.
I have no idea. Whom do you think we should ask?
What is my cause?
35% =/= "most", and it's only as high as 35% because of the relentless denial by some parts of the media.
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
The only thing I get out of that tweet is that Yevgeny (Eugene) Vindman is a hack. As repugnant as Flynn's comments were, they are devoid of imminent threat. I don't care if you the kind of lawyer who chases ambulances or dots i's and crosses t's in corporate contracts, every lawyer should be familiar with Brandenburg v. Ohio. Those remarks are so squarely covered by the Brandenburg v. Ohio precedent the case wouldn't make it in the front door before it was tossed.
The Brandenburg v. Ohio U.S. Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech—including speech that constitutes an incitement to violence—is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as long as it does not indicate an "imminent" threat.
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
Speech that supports law-breaking or violence in general is protected by the First Amendment unless it directly encourages people to take an unlawful action immediately.supreme.justia.com
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Why can’t Liz Cheney move on?
Republicans supporting a military coup. That’s pretty normal for a democracy:
Republicans supporting a military coup. That’s pretty normal for a democracy: