What's new

Republicans and Fascism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Nope. Just trying to learn, as always….






View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bntGdNFAAAw


So there you have it. A few articles and a video. It’s a start. It was already well known that the QAnon conspiracy had spread to Europe. So, I am interested in both the roots, and the wide appeal, and the future, of this particular upwelling of irrationality in the Western psyche. That’s why I posted the articles that so upset you. Seems to me understanding the causes always helps in developing potential solutions. Seems to me it’s you filling in the gaps of what you believe concerning me.

Dont provide those links to him. His head is in the sand where he likes it. He cant see.
 
Dont provide those links to him. His head is in the sand where he likes it. He cant see.
He can provide the links but they aren't of any interest. I, like most people, simply don't care about QAnon. I simply find humor in how QAnon seems to be the reason for everything in Red's world. I know he calls it curiosity and learning but if the answer is always QAnon for everything, then I don't believe what is going on there is curiosity and learning.

The-Number-23-movie-poster.jpg
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Red
He can provide the links but they aren't of any interest. I, like most people, simply don't care about QAnon. I simply find humor in how QAnon seems to be the reason for everything in Red's world. I know he calls it curiosity and learning but if the answer is always QAnon for everything, then I don't believe what is going on there is curiosity and learning.

The-Number-23-movie-poster.jpg
Red doesn't seem singularly focused on QAnon to me. In fact, he seems to be well informed and knowledgeable on a wide array of subjects. What has given you the impression that he is obsessed and narrowly focused on QAnon?

Have you tried talking to him about meteorites? I think he's dedicated a lot more attention to that then he has QAnon by many many times.
 
Last edited:
From open AI chatbotGPT

"
is fascism or socialism more likely to lead to mass death


It is difficult to say which political ideology is more likely to lead to mass death, as both fascism and socialism have been responsible for atrocities and human rights abuses throughout history. Fascism, with its emphasis on nationalistic and authoritarian ideologies, has been associated with regimes that have committed genocide and other mass atrocities. Socialism, on the other hand, has been associated with dictatorships and authoritarian governments that have also committed human rights abuses. Ultimately, the likelihood of mass death is not inherent in either ideology, but rather depends on how the ideology is implemented and the specific actions of those in power."
 
I simply find humor in how QAnon seems to be the reason for everything in Red's world. I know he calls it curiosity and learning but if the answer is always QAnon for everything, then I don't believe what is going on there is curiosity and learning.
Lol. Find anyone else on this forum that would agree with this….
Red doesn't seem singularly focused on QAnon to me.
At this point I think he says that just to see if he can get a rise out of me, and not because he actually believes that. Probably time I treated him as a troll, and not simply call him one. He believes it’s easier to trigger me than anyone else, and he’s not wrong, he has done that at times….

I think one of the main attributes of AI-O-Meter is that he is very incurious. And being incurious is a very Trumpian attribute, is it not? It certainly fits…
 
I don't believe what is going on there is curiosity and learning.
Being as anti-intellectual, anti-learning, as you clearly have demonstrated you are, repeatedly on this forum, the reason behind your misguided belief is likely at least partly because curiosity about the world and learning are unfamiliar to you. That, and the juvenile desire to get a rise out of me of course. Anybody with any interest at all in the social sciences would find the rise of QAnon to be something worthwhile of study. But here’s the thing: you know that, and you don’t disagree with that statement at all. But you could never admit that.

I guess it’s also conceivable that the fact that I was correct in emphasizing that “concern for democracy” would be a key motivating factor in the midterms, and how often you attacked and mocked that opinion, and your insistence that it would never trump economic concerns, thereby rendering your opinion incorrect, might cause you to lash out at the simple and undeniably accurate suggestion that looking at the causes and spread of QAnon might tell us something about the Western mind at this time. I mean, you did vanish for a spell following the Red Ripple. A little cowardly, I chuckled at the time, but you were so wrong, I can understand the embarrassment you must have felt at the results. That’s only a human response, and I might have done the same, had there been the Red Wave you were so eagerly anticipating.

So, sorry, but you do believe, and know full well, that curiosity and learning were my motivations. The jig’s up for you. You don’t believe a single word you said. You’re bitter, and you’re losing.
 
Some people are just ****** people. He’s the type of idiot I remember seeing sitting in the back of the classroom making farting noises with his armpits. But once students graduate from middle school they find annoying. Yet, instead of changing, he becomes bitter and starts attacking those who used to take him seriously. Likewise, People are figuring him out/losing interest in wasting time with him and now he’s lashing out at the handful of those on this forum who used to actually engage with him. Those who treated him fairly despite his bad faith arguments are those he’s crapping on the most. Pathetic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have you tried talking to him about meteorites? I think he's dedicated a lot more attention to that then he has QAnon by many many times.
Red has not dedicated many more times his attention to meteorites than QAnon. If you don't believe me then do the search for yourself on user Red and search term 'meteorites' vs 'QAnon'.

However I will admit that Red is not the Church Lady for QAnon here on JazzFanz.

screen20shot202016-05-0820at207-38-4420am.png


That title belongs firmly to The Thriller. Most of your mentions of QAnon were actually directed at The Thriller in telling him he was going overboard. Red and The Thriller combined account for nearly half of all mentions of QAnon on JazzFanz. Here is the data:

QAnon-Chart.gif

QAnon-Table.gif
 
Red has not dedicated many more times his attention to meteorites than QAnon. If you don't believe me then do the search for yourself on user Red and search term 'meteorites' vs 'QAnon'.

However I will admit that Red is not the Church Lady for QAnon here on JazzFanz.

screen20shot202016-05-0820at207-38-4420am.png


That title belongs firmly to The Thriller. Most of your mentions of QAnon were actually directed at The Thriller in telling him he was going overboard. Red and The Thriller combined account for nearly half of all mentions of QAnon on JazzFanz. Here is the data:

QAnon-Chart.gif

QAnon-Table.gif
You're being obtuse...
I mean in life. Red exists outside Jazzfanz, believe it or not.
 
He can provide the links but they aren't of any interest. I, like most people, simply don't care about QAnon. I simply find humor in how QAnon seems to be the reason for everything in Red's world. I know he calls it curiosity and learning but if the answer is always QAnon for everything, then I don't believe what is going on there is curiosity and learning.

The-Number-23-movie-poster.jpg

Lol the fact you think qanon is reds answer for everything shows how unhinged you are. Hope you get the help you need


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Red doesn't seem singularly focused on QAnon to me. In fact, he seems to be well informed and knowledgeable on a wide array of subjects. What has given you the impression that he is obsessed and narrowly focused on QAnon?

Have you tried talking to him about meteorites? I think he's dedicated a lot more attention to that then he has QAnon by many many times.
Al is actually engaging in gaslighting in a way. Trying to convince someone they are obsessed with exactly the thing they are saying others are obsessed with. Textbook manipulation techniques. But he is intellectually dishonest, so really it's just trolling. Not sure really what his agenda is at this point.
 
Red has not dedicated many more times his attention to meteorites than QAnon. If you don't believe me then do the search for yourself on user Red and search term 'meteorites' vs 'QAnon'.

However I will admit that Red is not the Church Lady for QAnon here on JazzFanz.

screen20shot202016-05-0820at207-38-4420am.png


That title belongs firmly to The Thriller. Most of your mentions of QAnon were actually directed at The Thriller in telling him he was going overboard. Red and The Thriller combined account for nearly half of all mentions of QAnon on JazzFanz. Here is the data:

QAnon-Chart.gif

QAnon-Table.gif
Hey I made the top 5! Yes!
 
Back
Top