What's new

Reputation Comments, positive and negative

Does anybody actually believe craig really gets all these ladies he keeps referring to? Unless her name is Rosie and she has some sisters, I'm not buying it.

Not a soul believes him...maybe it was some girl that he got to videotape him at the gym. Really cool move btw.
 
02-09-2012 03:13 PM
NUMBERICA
Thread: Court: California gay...

You can stand up for your belief that you're difference of taste should categorically exclude people from something they want to do that is one of the most harmless things imaginable. I can stand up for the view that that is categorically despicable.

You really have a lot of anger inside you for people with a different viewpoint than you.
Let it go, really, let it go.
This is for you and everyone you interact with.
I really find you to be a negative and offensive person, and you don't see me neg repping what you post because I disagree with you. In fairness I did neg rep a post in this same thread, partially because I didn't "agree" with the post, and partially in retaliation for your lame and angry neg rep.

It's interesting to me the things society thinks are harmless, but find out later that they were not harmless after all. Could this be one of those things?
Just me thinking out loud.
 
You really have a lot of anger inside you for people with a different viewpoint than you.
Let it go, really, let it go.
This is for you and everyone you interact with.
I really find you to be a negative and offensive person, and you don't see me neg repping what you post because I disagree with you. In fairness I did neg rep a post in this same thread, partially because I didn't "agree" with the post, and partially in retaliation for your lame and angry neg rep.

It's interesting to me the things society thinks are harmless, but find out later that they were not harmless after all. Could this be one of those things?
Just me thinking out loud.
Careful, he may call you a bully like he did me. He's just another Mormon bigot. Haters gonna hate. Btw, I love his electroshock comment. Cool!
 
You really have a lot of anger inside you for people with a different viewpoint than you.
Let it go, really, let it go.
This is for you and everyone you interact with.
I really find you to be a negative and offensive person, and you don't see me neg repping what you post because I disagree with you. In fairness I did neg rep a post in this same thread, partially because I didn't "agree" with the post, and partially in retaliation for your lame and angry neg rep.

It's interesting to me the things society thinks are harmless, but find out later that they were not harmless after all. Could this be one of those things?
Just me thinking out loud.

I think the only thing more dangerous than two dudes that love each other is people that put so much effort into justifying bigotry.
 
1976, dude. A lot of medical and psychological practices were stupid and ignorant.
Just because BYU admitted to one instance of that does not mean that was the only time it was used. How many times does a thief thieve before caught? It's not the only kind of damaging aversion therapy that's been used, and probably is being used today still (obviously a subjective matter, I can't conceive of the levels of cognitive dissonance and depression that has to spring forth from being forced to focus on a core part of your being being evil and having to be eradicated). This is not exclusive to the LDS church, either.

That's all a rather secondary point. The primary point is let's not consider 'curing' homosexuality a viable option, homosexuality itself exists, has existed, and will continue to exist and that what two people want to do with each other isn't anyone else's business. I'm pretty sure you agree.
 
Back
Top